Bug#464848: marked as done (ITP: xserver-xorg-video-openchrome -- Improved Xorg video driver for VIA UniChrome graphics chipsets)
Your message dated Mon, 09 Jun 2008 19:28:28 +0000
with message-id <E1K5n2a-0003wh-UR@ries.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#464848: fixed in xserver-xorg-video-openchrome 1:0.2.902+svn570-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #464848,
regarding ITP: xserver-xorg-video-openchrome -- Improved Xorg video driver for VIA UniChrome graphics chipsets
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
464848: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=464848
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: RFP: xserver-xorg-video-openchrome -- Improved Xorg video driver for VIA UniChrome graphics chipsets
- From: Per Olofsson <pelle@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2008 12:08:42 +0100
- Message-id: <20080209110842.19635.71203.reportbug@heffalump>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : xserver-xorg-video-openchrome
Version : 0.2.901
Upstream Author : OpenChrome Project <openchrome-users@openchrome.org>
* URL : http://www.openchrome.org/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: C
Description : Improved Xorg video driver for VIA UniChrome graphics chipsets
OpenChrome is based on VIA's UniChrome video driver. It seems to be
much more actively maintained than the via driver in Xorg. It also has
features such as 3D acceleration and XvMC for certain chipsets.
There is already an Ubuntu package, and I found this git repository:
http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-xorg/driver/xserver-xorg-video-openchrome.git
But it's still nice to have a wnpp bug tracking it.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 464848-close@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#464848: fixed in xserver-xorg-video-openchrome 1:0.2.902+svn570-1
- From: Raphael Geissert <atomo64@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 19:28:28 +0000
- Message-id: <E1K5n2a-0003wh-UR@ries.debian.org>
Source: xserver-xorg-video-openchrome
Source-Version: 1:0.2.902+svn570-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xserver-xorg-video-openchrome, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.2.902+svn570-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/x/xserver-xorg-video-openchrome/xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.2.902+svn570-1.diff.gz
xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.2.902+svn570-1.dsc
to pool/main/x/xserver-xorg-video-openchrome/xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.2.902+svn570-1.dsc
xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.2.902+svn570-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xserver-xorg-video-openchrome/xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.2.902+svn570-1_i386.deb
xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.2.902+svn570.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/x/xserver-xorg-video-openchrome/xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.2.902+svn570.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 464848@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Raphael Geissert <atomo64@gmail.com> (supplier of updated xserver-xorg-video-openchrome package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 19:51:43 -0500
Source: xserver-xorg-video-openchrome
Binary: xserver-xorg-video-openchrome
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:0.2.902+svn570-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force <debian-x@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Raphael Geissert <atomo64@gmail.com>
Description:
xserver-xorg-video-openchrome - X.Org X server -- VIA display driver
Closes: 464848
Changes:
xserver-xorg-video-openchrome (1:0.2.902+svn570-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* First upload to Debian (Closes: #464848)
* New upstream release + snapshot
* Updated copyright information
* Conflicts: libchromexvmc1, libchromexvmcpro1 so Replaces takes
effect
Checksums-Sha1:
1976c0be1944c77f83a5785809951c8a42809018 1844 xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.2.902+svn570-1.dsc
d24b45585ce04a6404311bc55525c9cfc7efe237 253444 xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.2.902+svn570.orig.tar.gz
ba1bb296ec241375ca51f077808aa41c0860ca1a 15371 xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.2.902+svn570-1.diff.gz
38f343172f17570b44738d8ce88a699fefaa9207 170854 xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.2.902+svn570-1_i386.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
282490de9a912b088d44b7c2dfdf235529a3674cb0642ed64ddc6ba6d8543793 1844 xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.2.902+svn570-1.dsc
82d5892d18dfc39dd033f8e7ab8fc0072205f66c292d9c90cbbc27403f1010c6 253444 xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.2.902+svn570.orig.tar.gz
738c73c4edf799d3aafa5cc8be7b52741d805477e024daaaac70eef4cc4b7728 15371 xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.2.902+svn570-1.diff.gz
2e512368b38e0314ba2ef973024f620da643b5d51d1643670d66eca89a1cfeca 170854 xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.2.902+svn570-1_i386.deb
Files:
9cc14804730de5c377784f819876eba8 1844 x11 optional xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.2.902+svn570-1.dsc
e4cd56fb25ddc40b3d23bf734c8477bb 253444 x11 optional xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.2.902+svn570.orig.tar.gz
12aa7fa8eba5da543fdfbf9f09d7cfc9 15371 x11 optional xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.2.902+svn570-1.diff.gz
6560e48f83d5fcf7c68ec694c82da865 170854 x11 optional xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.2.902+svn570-1_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFIQckOmEvTgKxfcAwRAjrDAJ9y9nf3dbnfup9UO97qGYdrrbwfNQCcDdLq
D8CzSaUV0N4MHlkYwN5+l+o=
=26a9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
Reply to: