Hello Matt and ROAF,
> So, in summary we want to use libdrm2. Have you looked at the removed
> symbols thing?
I've looked and as far as I can see the symbols seem okay, but would
appreciate if someone else could confirm. The packages linked below now
generate a libdrm2 package accordingly and I've tested the upgrade and
downgrade to the unstable version with no obvious problems.
> > 2. Maintainer/Uploaders field
> If you want to just setup something, I'll go with whatever.
Christopher Halse Rogers wrote:
> It seems reasonable to do this in XSF, but I'm not a member of it either,
> so just a repository on alioth may be more convenient.
Okay, so it seems that none of us are members! However, for a number of
reasons I think we should go ahead and join the XSF and host the packaging
there. (If there is some reason why we can't join then we will obviously
have to reevaluate this.) Not sure how the Ubuntu PPA stuff works, but I'm
sure a branch for ROAF's Ubuntu stuff would be very welcome if it would help.
I've uploaded updated packages here:
http://chris-lamb.co.uk/debian/drm-snapshot_2.3.1~git%2b20080602%2bac4da86-1.dsc
http://chris-lamb.co.uk/debian/xserver-xorg-video-nouveau_0.0.10~git%2b20080602%2be034616-1.dsc
I believe these are Ready For Upload; we can get the packaging hosted
somewhere whilst they pause in NEW.
Regards,
--
Chris Lamb, UK chris@chris-lamb.co.uk
GPG: 0x634F9A20
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature