--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: mudnames: should this package be orphaned or removed?
- From: Barry deFreese <bddebian@comcast.net>
- Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:07:28 -0400
- Message-id: <47D6E680.5080101@comcast.net>
Package: mudnames
Version: 1.6-2
Severity: serious
User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Usertags: proposed-orphan
Dear Maintainer,
While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a package that
should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because:
* Severely outdated. (Last upload Apr. 2003).
* Maintainer appears inactive. (Package was RFA'd in 2006).
* Low popcon. (55 installs).
If you think that it should be removed from Debian instead of being
orphaned, please reply to this bug and tell so.
If you disagree and want to continue to maintain this package, please
close this bug and do an upload also fixing the other issues.
Also, you can study the possibility of taking co-maintainers.
If you agree that it should be orphaned, send the following commands
to control@bugs.debian.org (replace nnnnnn with this bug's number):
severity nnnnnn normal
reassign nnnnnn wnpp
retitle nnnnnn O: <packagename> -- <short package description>
thanks
If you think it should be removed, send the following commands instead:
severity nnnnnn normal
reassign nnnnnn ftp.debian.org
retitle nnnnnn RM: <packagename> -- RoM; <reasons>
thanks
For more information, see
http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-archive-manip
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
Thank you,
Barry deFreese
--- End Message ---