[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#472789: marked as done (ITP: lua-coxpcall -- Extension to the lua protected call mechanism to croutines)



Your message dated Thu, 03 Apr 2008 18:05:20 +0000
with message-id <E1JhToO-0005xl-W3@ries.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#472789: fixed in lua-coxpcall 1.11.0+cvs20080310-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #472789,
regarding ITP: lua-coxpcall -- Extension to the lua protected call mechanism to croutines
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
472789: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=472789
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org

--- Please fill out the fields below. ---

   Package name: lua-coxpcall
        Version: 1.11.0
Upstream Author: Kepler Project
            URL: http://coxpcall.luaforge.net
        License: MIT/X
    Description: 
       This package contains coxpcall, a Lua library that extends the
       protected call mechanism typical of Lua (xpcall and pcall)
       allowing it to cross coroutines boundaries.

-- 
Enrico Tassi



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: lua-coxpcall
Source-Version: 1.11.0+cvs20080310-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
lua-coxpcall, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

liblua5.1-coxpcall0_1.11.0+cvs20080310-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/l/lua-coxpcall/liblua5.1-coxpcall0_1.11.0+cvs20080310-1_all.deb
lua-coxpcall_1.11.0+cvs20080310-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/l/lua-coxpcall/lua-coxpcall_1.11.0+cvs20080310-1.diff.gz
lua-coxpcall_1.11.0+cvs20080310-1.dsc
  to pool/main/l/lua-coxpcall/lua-coxpcall_1.11.0+cvs20080310-1.dsc
lua-coxpcall_1.11.0+cvs20080310.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/l/lua-coxpcall/lua-coxpcall_1.11.0+cvs20080310.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 472789@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Enrico Tassi <gareuselesinge@debian.org> (supplier of updated lua-coxpcall package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:39:37 +0100
Source: lua-coxpcall
Binary: liblua5.1-coxpcall0
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.11.0+cvs20080310-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Enrico Tassi <gareuselesinge@debian.org>
Changed-By: Enrico Tassi <gareuselesinge@debian.org>
Description: 
 liblua5.1-coxpcall0 - Protected function calls across coroutines for Lua 5.1
Closes: 472789
Changes: 
 lua-coxpcall (1.11.0+cvs20080310-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Initial release. (Closes: #472789)
Files: 
 f7653a64faebffdbbe818db8f4de5e81 851 interpreters optional lua-coxpcall_1.11.0+cvs20080310-1.dsc
 39b5108a7062092cbe633205aeaab927 17337 interpreters optional lua-coxpcall_1.11.0+cvs20080310.orig.tar.gz
 571279895d3549b0526f78bd0511cafc 2165 interpreters optional lua-coxpcall_1.11.0+cvs20080310-1.diff.gz
 1d1bb344ec0802b0ff5e3a98ed245964 4524 interpreters optional liblua5.1-coxpcall0_1.11.0+cvs20080310-1_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFH6kFs7kkcPgEj8vIRAmeOAKCQ108Sge2iAhaK4681AizSfRhX6QCeJJoe
BXb4RmYMtu8MJDuegW2Ftgw=
=jyBW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



--- End Message ---

Reply to: