[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#451106: Bug#449355: llvm: should this package be removed?



On 15/11/07 at 08:44 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net> (05/11/2007):
> > If you think that it should be orphaned instead of being removed from
> > Debian, please reply to this bug and tell so.
> 
> Just to keep you posted, there are some ongoing discussions on the llvm2
> ITP bug (#451106), between MadCoder, Arthur Loiret, and the maintainer.

Thank you for the pointer.
 
Arthur, have you made some progress on adopting this package (and
switching to llvm2)? Are there some blockers?
-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas@nussbaum.fr             GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: