Bug#445645: marked as done (ITP: vdr-plugin-svdrpext -- VDR plugin that extends the SVDRP command set of VDR)
Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2007 17:41:17 +0000
with message-id <E1Ih7Sn-0007S9-V7@ries.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#445645: fixed in vdr-plugin-svdrpext 0.0.1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian VDR Team <pkg-vdr-dvb-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
* Package name : vdr-plugin-svdrpext
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Author : Frank Schmirler <vdrdev@schmirler.de>
* URL : http://vdr.schmirler.de
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : VDR plugin that extends the SVDRP command set of VDR
This VDR plugin adds some new OSD related commands to VDR's
remote SVDRP control interface.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable'), (190, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.23-rc6-w3n
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: vdr-plugin-svdrpext
Source-Version: 0.0.1-9
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
vdr-plugin-svdrpext, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
vdr-plugin-svdrpext_0.0.1-9.diff.gz
to pool/main/v/vdr-plugin-svdrpext/vdr-plugin-svdrpext_0.0.1-9.diff.gz
vdr-plugin-svdrpext_0.0.1-9.dsc
to pool/main/v/vdr-plugin-svdrpext/vdr-plugin-svdrpext_0.0.1-9.dsc
vdr-plugin-svdrpext_0.0.1-9_i386.deb
to pool/main/v/vdr-plugin-svdrpext/vdr-plugin-svdrpext_0.0.1-9_i386.deb
vdr-plugin-svdrpext_0.0.1.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/v/vdr-plugin-svdrpext/vdr-plugin-svdrpext_0.0.1.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 445645@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Thomas Schmidt <tschmidt@debian.org> (supplier of updated vdr-plugin-svdrpext package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2007 16:56:13 +0200
Source: vdr-plugin-svdrpext
Binary: vdr-plugin-svdrpext
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.0.1-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian VDR Team <pkg-vdr-dvb-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Thomas Schmidt <tschmidt@debian.org>
Description:
vdr-plugin-svdrpext - VDR plugin that extends the SVDRP command set of VDR
Closes: 445645
Changes:
vdr-plugin-svdrpext (0.0.1-9) unstable; urgency=low
.
* First upload to the official archive (Closes: #445645)
* Updated debian/copyright
* Changed Maintainer to the Debian VDR Team
* Added Tobias Grimm, Thomas Günther and myself to Uploaders
* Build-Depend on debhelper (>= 5), set COMPAT-Level to 5
Files:
eb22f05993a120cab388fd97733c7676 922 misc extra vdr-plugin-svdrpext_0.0.1-9.dsc
6f4f21ddc8a042631a0108a8b9dbb295 12484 misc extra vdr-plugin-svdrpext_0.0.1.orig.tar.gz
f8f98e48bf75b1d2e2d792a644d03175 2508 misc extra vdr-plugin-svdrpext_0.0.1-9.diff.gz
8b7360c5c4226f08afcca9690d66bb4a 10894 misc extra vdr-plugin-svdrpext_0.0.1-9_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHCPRhc9+NqwoydlIRAsgcAKCOEMcpnNUHCabaZxszQvZnVNaQzgCeIE3/
zLeMC+eBOJg/nFRtY+8Mx1s=
=HtxE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
Reply to: