Processed: Re: Bug#429794: jmagick: should this package be orphaned?

To: Kumar Appaiah <akumar@ee.iitm.ac.in>
Cc: <wnpp@debian.org>(wnpp #429794)
Subject: Processed: Re: Bug#429794: jmagick: should this package be orphaned?
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 16:30:04 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] handler.s.C.119229283225328.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20071013163406.GA4056@localhost>
References: <[🔎] 20071013163406.GA4056@localhost>

Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> owner 429794 !
Bug#429794: O: jmagick -- A java interface to ImageMagick - java classes
Owner recorded as Kumar Appaiah <akumar@ee.iitm.ac.in>.

> retitle 429794 ITA: jmagick -- A java interface to ImageMagick - java classes
Bug#429794: O: jmagick -- A java interface to ImageMagick - java classes
Changed Bug title to `ITA: jmagick -- A java interface to ImageMagick - java classes' from `O: jmagick -- A java interface to ImageMagick - java classes'.

> thankyou
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#429794: jmagick: should this package be orphaned?
  - From: Kumar Appaiah <akumar@ee.iitm.ac.in>

Prev by Date: Bug#429794: jmagick: should this package be orphaned?
Next by Date: Processed: Re: Bug#423202: topal: should this package be removed?
Previous by thread: Bug#429794: jmagick: should this package be orphaned?
Next by thread: Processed: Re: Bug#423202: topal: should this package be removed?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread