Processed: Re: Bug#423240: comedi: should this package be orphaned?

To: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net>
Cc: David Schleef <ds@schleef.org>(comedi #423240), <wnpp@debian.org>(wnpp #423240)
Subject: Processed: Re: Bug#423240: comedi: should this package be orphaned?
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 13:33:07 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] handler.s.C.119228226622423.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <20071013133052.GA28821@xanadu.blop.info>
References: <20071013133052.GA28821@xanadu.blop.info>

Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> severity 423240 normal
Bug#423240: comedi: should this package be orphaned?
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'

> reassign 423240 wnpp
Bug#423240: comedi: should this package be orphaned?
Bug reassigned from package `comedi' to `wnpp'.

> retitle 423240 O: comedi -- Comedi kernel module source
Bug#423240: comedi: should this package be orphaned?
Changed Bug title to `O: comedi -- Comedi kernel module source' from `comedi: should this package be orphaned?'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Reply to:

Prev by Date: Re: Handling of poorly maintained and useless packages
Next by Date: Processed: Re: Bug#423285: fwatch: should this package be orphaned?
Previous by thread: Re: Handling of poorly maintained and useless packages
Next by thread: Processed: Re: Bug#423285: fwatch: should this package be orphaned?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread