--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Description:
Z81/Z81txt/xz81 are ZX81 (TS1000) and ZX80 emulators
for (respectively) svgalib, text mode, and X. They
load/save Xtender-format .P files, and support the
ZX81's pseudo-hi-res mode. A few ZX81-related utils,
GIFs of the keyboard layout, two PD tetris clones,
a PD minesweeper clone, and a pear tree are included.
(Just add partridge.)
Copyright:
Z80 emulation and much X code from `xz80', copyright (C) 1994 Ian Collier.
ZX81/ZX80 support and VGA/text front-ends (C) 1995-1999 Russell Marks.
[ Standard GPL >= 2 blurb deleted]
ROM issues
----------
`zx80.rom' is a copy of the ZX80's 4k ROM, and `zx81.rom' is a copy of
the ZX81's 8k ROM - both are copyright Amstrad plc., and are used and
reproduced with permission. (Amstrad allow free use of the ROMs in
emulators, but retain the copyright.)
Sources:
http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/system/emulators/zx/z81-1.2.tar.gz
Packaging Commentary and Questions:
I am intending to build this as a multi-binary package - one for
SVGA, one for X, one for the console, and a 'common' package
containing z81get and the ROM images.
Since I havn't been able to find a copy of the actual license for
the ROM images, it looks like they at least will have to go in
non-free. Can I put the rest of the packages in contrib, or do
they have to go in non-free too? (And if they can go in contrib,
should I split z81get into a fifth package so that it can go in
contrib too?)
Christopher
--
Christopher Allen . + . -===""===- c==== .
email: cpcallen@ruah.dyndns.org * . . \ \____}}
WWW: http://ruah.dyndns.org/~cpcallen/ . * @====-' .
snail: 29 Young St. W., Waterloo, ON, N2L 2Y9 Canada . *
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hello,
This is an automatic mail sent to close the RFP you have reported or
are involved with.
Your RFP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 365 days.
- It hasn't had any activity recently.
As this is an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the RFP is still of your interest, or there has been
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).
To re-open it, you simply have to mail control@bugs.debian.org
with a body text like this:
reopen 84395
stop
Further comments on the work done in the bug sent to
84395@bugs.debian.org would be truly welcomed.
Anyway, if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <damog@debian.org>.
A similar process is being applied to other kind of wnpp bugs.
Thanks for your cooperation,
-- David Moreno Garza <damog@debian.org>.
--- End Message ---