[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#419009: marked as done (ITP: fcode-utils -- OpenBIOS FCode utilities)

Your message dated Mon, 09 Jul 2007 21:33:58 +0000
with message-id <E1I80rm-0003ai-QQ@ries.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#419009: fixed in fcode-utils 1.0.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org>

* Package name    : fcode-utils
  Version         : 1.0.2
  Upstream Author : Stefan Reinauer <stepan@openbios.org>
                    David L. Paktor <dlpaktor@us.ibm.com>
* URL             : http://www.openbios.org
* License         : GPL v2 + CPL 1.0
  Programming Lang: C, Forth
  Description     : OpenBIOS FCode utilities

 FCode is a Forth programming language dialect compliant with ANS Forth.
 It can exist in two forms; source code and a compiled version, known as
 bytecode. It is of interest mainly for its use in OpenFirmware.
 .
 This package provides a set of FCode utilities:
  - the tokenizer toke
  - the detokenizer detok
  - a PCI rom header utility
  - a portable implementation of Forth local values


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: sparc
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-sparc32
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: fcode-utils
Source-Version: 1.0.2-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
fcode-utils, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

fcode-utils_1.0.2-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/f/fcode-utils/fcode-utils_1.0.2-1.diff.gz
fcode-utils_1.0.2-1.dsc
  to pool/main/f/fcode-utils/fcode-utils_1.0.2-1.dsc
fcode-utils_1.0.2-1_hurd-i386.deb
  to pool/main/f/fcode-utils/fcode-utils_1.0.2-1_hurd-i386.deb
fcode-utils_1.0.2.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/f/fcode-utils/fcode-utils_1.0.2.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 419009@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org> (supplier of updated fcode-utils package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 12:37:19 +0200
Source: fcode-utils
Binary: fcode-utils
Architecture: source hurd-i386
Version: 1.0.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org>
Changed-By: Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org>
Description: 
 fcode-utils - OpenBIOS FCode utilities
Closes: 419009
Changes: 
 fcode-utils (1.0.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Initial Release (closes: bug#419009).
Files: 
 5b170f99fb7923f69f12f66394a7bf3c 577 misc optional fcode-utils_1.0.2-1.dsc
 68d8a484fa3f1722a9c78d3e153f85b9 4307303 misc optional fcode-utils_1.0.2.orig.tar.gz
 78e4fb64a824c732c587cc23e955ab16 10931 misc optional fcode-utils_1.0.2-1.diff.gz
 8579e331b9bab9e088b47fed2e869e5b 146424 misc optional fcode-utils_1.0.2-1_hurd-i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGeIKow3ao2vG823MRAt/TAJ9nObjzFidGVxpzWaQuGmXEdcqX9QCeLhNT
5cqAkQRUCw1V+aM7GO/XOo4=
=zlO1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: