[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#355643: marked as done (ITP: xsltsl -- XSLT Standard Library stylesheets)



Your message dated Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:24:30 +0000
with message-id <20061212122430.aee45d83.codehelp@debian.org>
and subject line No upstream release, no need for separate package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Neil Williams <linux@codehelp.co.uk>


* Package name    : xsltsl
  Version         : 1.2.2
  Upstream Author : Steve Ball <Steve.Ball@zveno.com>
* URL             : http://xsltsl.sourceforge.net/
* License         : LGPL
  Description     : XSLT Standard Library stylesheets

The XSLT Standard Library, xsltsl, provides the XSLT developer with a
set of XSLT templates for commonly used functions. These are implemented
purely in XSLT, that is they do not use any extensions.

The current version, 1.2.1, has an unclear/incomplete licence declaration 
and the release contains spurious CVS directories but after contacting the
upstream developer, both issues should be resolved for the next release.

Hence this ITP is for the next release, 1.2.2 or later.

Some of these stylesheets are likely to be included in the pilot-qof package 
in the meantime.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.25-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1)


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
I've decided not to pursue XSLTSL due to delays in a suitable upstream
release. It's simpler to package the XSL within pilot-qof.

If someone else wants to wait for an xsltsl release, feel free to
reopen this as a RFP.

--


Neil Williams
=============
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/

Attachment: pgpiSkuE2h_nY.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---

Reply to: