Hi On Mon, 2 Oct 2006 20:23:24 +0100 James Westby <jw+debian@jameswestby.net> wrote: > Ok, so by source I probably meant these CSV files, what the GPL calls > "preferred form of modification". If the package is GPL (I forget) then > this is required to be distributable. It's GNU FDL (and thus targeted to non-free) and there is AFAIK no such condition there. > My concerns were raised due to the fact that the source package only > contains binary files, so it is unlikely that is the format they are > edited in. Well data is edited online in MySQL database, any other format is just export from it. There would be also slight problem with CSV sources that they stay on upstream server only for one day, so checksum can not be verified. Anyway I'm open to change, I will probably ask on -mentors for more opinions. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature