[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#150778: marked as done (RFP: amslatex2000-styles -- Old version LaTeX compatibility styles)

Your message dated Mon, 2 Oct 2006 16:24:07 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <58738.131.220.223.202.1159799047.squirrel@mail.beamnet.de>
and subject line Obsolete
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: tetex-extra
Version: 1.0.2+20011202-2
Severity: wishlist

Hi.

Would it be possible to add (symlinks to get) versioned ams*.sty-files
(cf <http://arxiv.org/help/faq/amslatex2000>).
arXiv.org seems to require/have those and it would be very pleasant to be able have them in vanilla Debian. 

Thanks for considering.

Regards

Thomas

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux hardy 2.4.18-tv #1 Tue Jun 18 00:51:16 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages tetex-extra depends on:
ii dpkg 1.9.21 Package maintenance system for Deb ii gsfonts 6.0-2 Fonts for the ghostscript interpre 
ii  tetex-base              1.0.2+20011202-2 basic teTeX library files
ii  tetex-bin               1.0.7+20011202-7 teTeX binary files

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Well, four years of the preprint server not using the files to be
packagesd them makes this RFP obsolete.

Kind regards

T.
-- 
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.de/

--- End Message ---
Reply to: