[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#381992: ITP: libming-fonts-openoffice -- Fonts for use with the Ming Library for SWF Creation



close 381992
thanks

Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 14:11 schrieb Stuart Anderson:
> On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> 
> > Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 09:28 schrieb Alejandro Rios P.:
> >> * Package name    : libming-fonts-openoffice
> >>   Version         : 0.1
> >>   Upstream Author : OpenOffice.org <dev@openoffice.org>
> >> * URL             : http://www.openoffice.org/
> >> * License         : GPL
> >>   Description     : Fonts for use with the Ming Library for SWF Creation
> >>
> >>  These are the OpenOffice Fonts converted for use with libming,
> 
> 
> I already have package for these fonts prepared as part of the ming
> sounrce package, and am awaiting some feedback from some of the packages
> that will use them. Feedback from others would be welcome as well.
> 
>   	deb http://www4.netsweng.com/~anderson/ming-unstable/ binary/

So Alejandros ITP is bogus. I feel free to close it then.

Alejandro (in case you read that in the buglog since your §%&§ mailserver doesn't accept mail):
The libming maintainer (especially when those font packages come
out of the ming source pkg) is the best person to maintain this.
Especially as there's a tool to build those fonts proper.

> > [Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:30:29 -0500] [ftpmaster: James Troup]
> > Removed the following packages from unstable:
> >
> > ------------------- Reason -------------------
> > RoQA; orphaned, dead upstream, grave bugs, unused.
> > ----------------------------------------------
> >
> > Did that change? Did you fix the grave bugs?
> 
> I have adopted the libming packages, and there has been a new version in
> unstable for a few weeks now.

Ah, yes. That makes the ITP obsolete since*if* this is to be packages it should be
either from libming (which Stuart maintains) or on-the-fly converted from
the font packages it's based on.

But this doesn't answer whether the grave bugs in the fonts was fixed. Alejandro ITPed
0.1 again which supposedly to that removal log has those grave bugs. Or that might be libming
only, I don't know.. But in any case, this were pre-connverted things afaik...

In the meanwhile, you answered on -devel that it's generated during the build from
opens___.ttf (which is the only font there). Please name it -opensymbol.

So Alejandros ITP is bogus. I feel free to close it then.

Regards,

Rene
-- 
 .''`.  René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
 `. `'  rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
   `-   Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB  7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73



Reply to: