[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#361296: O: sppc -- Simple Panel Plot Composer



Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

The current maintainer of sppc, Mikael Hedin <micce@debian.org>,
has orphaned this package.

If you want to be the new maintainer, please take it -- see
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/index.html#howto-o for detailed
instructions how to adopt a package properly.

Some information about this package:

Package: sppc
Binary: sppc
Version: 1.0.1-8.1
Priority: optional
Section: math
Maintainer: Mikael Hedin <micce@debian.org>
Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), glutg3-dev, xlibosmesa-dev, libxmu-dev, automake1.6
Architecture: any
Standards-Version: 3.5.2
Format: 1.0
Directory: pool/main/s/sppc
Files:
 6326a7a91373a9314a040165c549fce2 604 sppc_1.0.1-8.1.dsc
 2a9d62ce9529069c492d840fd86e6550 89905 sppc_1.0.1.orig.tar.gz
 58eed5b5622d38664e39025ab48c6a51 11642 sppc_1.0.1-8.1.diff.gz

Package: sppc
Priority: optional
Section: math
Installed-Size: 180
Maintainer: Mikael Hedin <micce@debian.org>
Architecture: i386
Version: 1.0.1-8.1
Depends: freeglut3, libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-4), libgcc1 (>= 1:3.3.4-1), libice6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libsm6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libstdc++5 (>= 1:3.3.4-1), libx11-6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libxext6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libxi6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libxmu6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libxt6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), xlibmesa-gl | libgl1, xlibmesa-glu | libglu1, xlibosmesa4
Suggests: lpr, gv | ghostview
Filename: pool/main/s/sppc/sppc_1.0.1-8.1_i386.deb
Size: 53772
MD5sum: 61ce21cfe965c844d33802a814cbc9b3
Description: Simple Panel Plot Composer
 This is SPPC (Simple Panel Plot Composer).  It can make output to
 postscript, ppm and gif files, or display in an OpenGL window.  It is
 used by tela, but can also be used standalone.
Tag: interface::x11, role::sw:utility, use::editing, use::viewing, works-with::image:raster, works-with::text:postscript, x11::application


Christoph
-- 
cb@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: