Bug#304159: GNU DL != GDL. Existing package GDL is unrelated.

To: David Golden <dgolden@cp.dias.ie>, Juan Antonio Añel Cabanelas <aetherlux@gulo.org>
Cc: 304159@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#304159: GNU DL != GDL. Existing package GDL is unrelated.
From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 02:42:38 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 20060303024238.GA316@deprecation.cyrius.com>
Reply-to: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>, 304159@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <1113214881.5787.1.camel@Descartes.uvigo.es> <20051020154633.GB4822@cp.dias.ie>
References: <1113214881.5787.1.camel@Descartes.uvigo.es> <20051020154633.GB4822@cp.dias.ie>

retitle 304159 gnudl -- A free IDL (Interactive Data Language) compatible
thanks

* David Golden <dgolden@cp.dias.ie> [2005-10-20 16:46]:
> Just to point out that the existing "gdl" (GNOME DevTool Libraries)
> source package in debian is AFAIK not related to 
> GNU Data Language (IDL clone) Juan's itp was for.
> 
> AFAIK there was a previous abortive itp #68057 which was going to
> use the package name "gnudl" for the GNU Data Language
> (IDL clone). : http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=68057

OK, let's retitle this bug then.  Juan, please find out whether gnudl
is a good idea or whether there's a better choice.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Processed: Re: GNU DL != GDL. Existing package GDL is unrelated.
  - From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
- Bug#304159: GNU DL != GDL. Existing package GDL is unrelated.
  - From: Juan Antonio Añel Cabanelas <aetherlux@gulo.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#351688: retitle
Next by Date: Processed: Re: GNU DL != GDL. Existing package GDL is unrelated.
Previous by thread: Processed: retitle
Next by thread: Processed: Re: GNU DL != GDL. Existing package GDL is unrelated.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread