[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#337657: marked as done (ITP: cl-fiveam -- simple regression testing framework)



Your message dated Wed, 01 Feb 2006 09:34:58 +0100
with message-id <87lkwvtr2l.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
and subject line [cl-debian] UCW status?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Nov 2005 16:11:49 +0000
>From luca@pca.it Sat Nov 05 08:11:49 2005
Return-path: <luca@pca.it>
Received: from (dione.pcaserver.net) [195.32.84.213] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EYQdw-0005w4-00; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 08:11:49 -0800
Received: (qmail 24555 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2005 17:11:45 +0100
Received: from sv3-100.epfl.ch (HELO gismo.pca.it) (128.178.192.100)
  by ilcascinale.com with SMTP; 5 Nov 2005 17:11:45 +0100
Received: by gismo.pca.it (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id F12EBCC5F; Sat,  5 Nov 2005 17:11:14 +0100 (CET)
From: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org> 
Subject: ITP: cl-fiveam -- simple regression testing framework
X-Debbugs-CC: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org, bese-devel@common-lisp.net, cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 17:11:12 +0100
Message-ID: <87ll03hy73.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
	X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

--=-=-=

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

* Package name    : cl-fiveam
  Version         : 1:20051105-1
  Upstream Author : Edward Marco Baringer <mb@bese.it>
* URL or Web page : http://common-lisp.net/project/bese/FiveAM.html
* License         : BSD
  Description     : simple regression testing framework

 FiveAM is a simple (as far as writing and running tests goes)
 regression testing framework. It has been designed with Common
 Lisp's interactive development model in mind.
 .
 Features:
  * Test and test suite hierarchies allow test to be organized into
    hierarchies to ease running
  * Functions for re-running recently run tests.
  * Inter-test dependencies.
 .
 The documentation is provided via the cl-qbook package.

=====

Continuation of the series of CL software started with bug #337646.

As soon as this bug will get a number by the BTS, I'll add the package
to the CL-Debian repository [1]. The package is linda and lintian
free and it follows the "Common Lisp in Debian Manual" [2].

Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca

[1] http://cl-debian.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/darcsweb.cgi
[2] http://cl-debian.alioth.debian.org/clid/clid.html/

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBDbNmiVAp7Xm10JmkRAij/AJ43Jiq8SL/BESDJ4D1A3ytWP8cutwCfXygZ
wGi2QwD/Ojb2AU4zBxCkraY=
=n1fv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 337657-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Feb 2006 08:35:42 +0000
>From luca@pca.it Wed Feb 01 00:35:42 2006
Return-path: <luca@pca.it>
Received: from [195.32.84.213] (helo=dione.pcaserver.net)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1F4DSo-0002lW-95
	for 337657-done@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 00:35:42 -0800
Received: (qmail 15625 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2006 09:35:25 +0100
Received: from 209.138.76.83.cust.bluewin.ch (HELO gismo.pca.it) (83.76.138.209)
  by littlegospelchoir.com with SMTP; 1 Feb 2006 09:35:25 +0100
Received: by gismo.pca.it (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 65AB0C145; Wed,  1 Feb 2006 09:35:09 +0100 (CET)
From: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>
To: Peter Van Eynde <cl-debian@pvaneynd.mailworks.org>
Cc: cl-debian@common-lisp.net, 337646-done@bugs.debian.org, 337657-done@bugs.debian.org, 337666-done@bugs.debian.org, 337662-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: [cl-debian] UCW status?
References: <1137110375.4651.13.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<871wz072qv.fsf@gismo.pca.it> <871wz0i6ws.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
	<200601222104.18914.cl-debian@pvaneynd.mailworks.org>
Reply-To: ML CL-Debian <cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 09:34:58 +0100
In-Reply-To: <200601222104.18914.cl-debian@pvaneynd.mailworks.org> (Peter Van
	Eynde's message of "Sun, 22 Jan 2006 21:04:18 +0100")
Message-ID: <87lkwvtr2l.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

--=-=-=
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello!

On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 21:04:18 +0100, Peter Van Eynde wrote:
> On Sunday 22 January 2006 17:06, Luca Capello wrote:
>> > Peter, could you check if arnesi, qbook and yaclml are ready for
>> > inclusion in Debian, please?
>>=20
>> You should check fiveam, too :-D
>
[...]
> As they build and installed without problems and even linda and=20
> lintian had no comments, I'm uploading them as I type.

And they finally are in unstable!  I'm cc:ing the ITPs and closing
them.

Now, for parenscript (ITP #349607 [1]), I'm waiting for the inclusion
or reject of a patch about the documentation.  The debian/ folder is
ready :-)

3AThx, bye,
Gismo / Luca

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D349607

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBD4HK9VAp7Xm10JmkRArSLAJ4tcer/yexChEggVYAtzbcyRavi3wCfboul
4l1nRfNRtDmxqOuE7efZl+w=
=Ilot
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--



Reply to: