[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#329645: marked as done (ITA: liblog-dispatch-perl -- Dispatches messages to multiple Log::Dispatch::* objects)



Your message dated Sat, 03 Dec 2005 14:02:59 -0800
with message-id <E1EifT9-0007Zf-1y@spohr.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#329645: fixed in liblog-dispatch-perl 2.11-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 13:16:37 +0000
>From ivan-debian@420.am Thu Sep 22 06:16:37 2005
Return-path: <ivan-debian@420.am>
Received: from wavetail.420.am [66.53.197.194] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EIQwH-0000bx-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 06:16:37 -0700
Received: from localhost (wavetail.420.am [127.0.0.1])
	by wavetail.420.am (Postfix) with ESMTP id 628FAFC8717;
	Thu, 22 Sep 2005 06:16:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wavetail.420.am ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (wavetail.420.am [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with LMTP id 02165-01; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 06:16:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rootwood.haze.st (unknown [24.32.24.25])
	by wavetail.420.am (Postfix) with SMTP id 67F76FC86BD;
	Thu, 22 Sep 2005 06:16:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rootwood.haze.st (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 22 Sep 2005 06:16:30 -0700
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 06:16:30 -0700
From: ivan-debian@420.am
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>,
	Stephen Quinney <sjq@debian.org>
Subject: RFA: liblog-dispatch-perl -- Dispatches messages to multiple Log::Dispatch::* objects
Message-ID: <20050922131629.GO3822@420.am>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at 420.am
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
	NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

I request an adopter for the liblog-dispatch-perl package.

The package description is:
 This module manages a set of Log::Dispatch::* objects, allowing you to
 add and remove output objects as desired.

-- 
_ivan

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 329645-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Dec 2005 22:11:09 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Sat Dec 03 14:11:09 2005
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1EifT9-0007Zf-1y; Sat, 03 Dec 2005 14:02:59 -0800
From: Jonas Genannt <jonas.genannt@capi2name.de>
To: 329645-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $
Subject: Bug#329645: fixed in liblog-dispatch-perl 2.11-1
Message-Id: <E1EifT9-0007Zf-1y@spohr.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2005 14:02:59 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: liblog-dispatch-perl
Source-Version: 2.11-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
liblog-dispatch-perl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

liblog-dispatch-perl_2.11-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libl/liblog-dispatch-perl/liblog-dispatch-perl_2.11-1.diff.gz
liblog-dispatch-perl_2.11-1.dsc
  to pool/main/libl/liblog-dispatch-perl/liblog-dispatch-perl_2.11-1.dsc
liblog-dispatch-perl_2.11-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/libl/liblog-dispatch-perl/liblog-dispatch-perl_2.11-1_all.deb
liblog-dispatch-perl_2.11.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/libl/liblog-dispatch-perl/liblog-dispatch-perl_2.11.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 329645@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Jonas Genannt <jonas.genannt@capi2name.de> (supplier of updated liblog-dispatch-perl package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 14:54:56 +0200
Source: liblog-dispatch-perl
Binary: liblog-dispatch-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.11-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jonas Genannt <jonas.genannt@capi2name.de>
Changed-By: Jonas Genannt <jonas.genannt@capi2name.de>
Description: 
 liblog-dispatch-perl - Dispatches messages to multiple Log::Dispatch::* objects
Closes: 329576 329645
Changes: 
 liblog-dispatch-perl (2.11-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release (Closes: #329576)
   * New Maintainer (Closes: #329645)
   * debian/control new standards version
   * cleaned up the debian/rules
Files: 
 1e5cb7d1a466aab65500d4a5dbb3f596 715 perl optional liblog-dispatch-perl_2.11-1.dsc
 85b9478df97e2e00b5d54befd6944001 28561 perl optional liblog-dispatch-perl_2.11.orig.tar.gz
 c2663281bd8caf0a2db84a8717f084ac 1738 perl optional liblog-dispatch-perl_2.11-1.diff.gz
 678bb62a1196b4fa9ab42b3a75ca5aad 62008 perl optional liblog-dispatch-perl_2.11-1_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDkf0l+YXjQAr8dHYRAghTAJ9uR0Uc506PWDoxmHLFL2/SMG7kkwCeIjBz
csToj7i9xSrLxRJdpOEZm2s=
=95lI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: