[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#272173: marked as done (RFP: latex-sanskrit -- latex support for devanagari and transliterated sanskrit)



Your message dated Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:18:30 -0600
with message-id <E1EIaKk-000717-00@merkel.debian.org>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Sep 2004 01:04:36 +0000
>From submit@bugs.debian.org Fri Sep 17 18:04:36 2004
Return-path: <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Received: from li7-90.members.linode.com (randomnode.info) [64.62.231.90] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1C8TeV-0006Ug-00; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 18:04:35 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by randomnode.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED4AF4239B;
	Fri, 17 Sep 2004 21:04:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from randomnode.info ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (laotzu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP
	id 20255-06; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 21:04:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from socrates.dnsalias.org (200-171-244-52.customer.telesp.net.br [200.171.244.52])
	by randomnode.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C5242398;
	Fri, 17 Sep 2004 21:04:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by socrates.dnsalias.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id A730E4AA7; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 22:04:20 -0300 (BRT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jeronimo Pellegrini <pellegrini@mpcnet.com.br>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: RFP: latex-sanskrit -- latex support for devanagari and transliterated
 sanskrit
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.99.3
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 22:04:20 -0300
Message-Id: <20040918010420.A730E4AA7@socrates.dnsalias.org>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at randomnode.info
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

* Package name    : latex-sanskrit
  Version         : 2.2
  Upstream Author : Charles Wikner
* URL             : http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/language/sanskrit/
* License         : LaTeX Project Public License
  Description     : latex support for devanagari and transliterated sanskrit

Latex-sanskrit consists of a preprocessor and fonts to display Sanskrit
in LaTeX documents. The Sanskrit text can be displayed either
transliterated or in devanagari script, including vedic accents. Sanskrit
is entered as argument to LaTeX macros, so it is still possible to use the
inputenc package to get yet another encoding mixed with the text (for
example, ISO-8859-1 with latin accents).

The fonts include over a thousand consonant ligatures, and the
documentation has a Samyoga table telling from where each ligature was
taken (Panini, Coulson, and other fonts). All fonts (devanagari and
transliterated) are available in standard, bold and italic faces, and
the spacing between devanagari characters may be adjusted.


-X-X-X- END of description -X-X-X-

NOTE from the package requestor:

Upstream author is not working on the project anymore. Quoting readme.txt:

-X-X-X-
Suggestions and bug reports to:
wikner@nacdh4.nac.ac.za
02 January 2002.

P.S.
I shall be retiring from the world at the end of March 2002,
and shall not be available on the Net.
-X-X-X-

However, his work is excellent, and makes typesetting Sanskrit very
easy; the fonts included look very good; the package has excellent
documentation. At least for me, makes Unicode irrelevant.

There are only  a few details in the C program that are rather easy to fix:

while(strlen(infilename) == 0) 
   { printf("Input file: "); scanf(infilename); }
printf("Output file: ");
scanf(outfilename);

This may loop forever if compiled with gcc-3.3, and can be fixed by
including the format string in scanf (but it would actually be better to check
the program and eliminate the possibility for buffer overflows).

The other problems are a few unused variables and the declaration of
main().


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (100, 'unstable'), (9, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8.1
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=ISO-8859-1 (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 272173-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 23:18:31 +0000
>From damog@merkel.debian.org Thu Sep 22 16:18:31 2005
Return-path: <damog@merkel.debian.org>
Received: from merkel.debian.org [192.25.206.16] (mail)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EIaKl-0001uA-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:18:31 -0700
Received: from damog by merkel.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EIaKk-000717-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:18:30 -0600
To: 272173-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: WNPP bug closing
Message-Id: <E1EIaKk-000717-00@merkel.debian.org>
From: David Moreno Garza <damog@merkel.debian.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:18:30 -0600
Delivered-To: 272173-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Hello,

This is an automatic mail sent to close the RFP you have reported or 
are involved with.

Your RFP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 365 days.
- It hasn't had any activity recently.

As this an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not 
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the RFP is still of your interest, or there has been 
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).

To re-open it, you simply have to mail control@bugs.debian.org
with a body text like this:

reopen 272173
thanks bts

Further comments on the work done in the bug sent to
272173@bugs.debian.org would be truly welcomed.
Anyway, if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <damog@debian.org>.

This is the second massive wnpp closing that is being done. The next close
will be done on inactive RFPs older than 365 days and finally, an automatic
script will close, by default, *inactive* RFPs when they reach one year of
inactivity.

A similar process is being applied to other kind of wnpp bugs.

Thanks for your cooperation,

 -- David Moreno Garza <damog@debian.org>  Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:06:42 -0500



Reply to: