[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#187158: marked as done (RFP: python-yapsnmp -- SNMP client for Python)



Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:12 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <20050915025512.E9C71107B52@cerdita.damog.net>
and subject line WNPP bug closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Apr 2003 14:08:05 +0000
>From smurf@smurf.noris.de Tue Apr 01 08:08:05 2003
Return-path: <smurf@smurf.noris.de>
Received: from play.smurf.noris.de [192.109.102.42] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 190MQm-0007s6-00; Tue, 01 Apr 2003 08:08:04 -0600
Received: from smurf by play.smurf.noris.de with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 190MQV-00014c-00; Tue, 01 Apr 2003 16:07:47 +0200
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 16:07:47 +0200
From: Matthias Urlichs <smurf@noris.de>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org
Bcc: Matthias Urlichs <smurf@noris.de>
Subject: ITP: python-yapsnmp -- SNMP client for Python
Message-ID: <20030401140747.GA3793@play.smurf.noris.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.10.1
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.0-gpgme-021125a
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.6 required=4.0
	tests=HAS_PACKAGE,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
	      USER_AGENT_MUTT,X_DEBBUGS_CC
	version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: 


--pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-04-01
Severity: wishlist

* Package name    : python-yapsnmp
  Version         : 0.7.6
  Upstream Author : Yves Perrenoud <yves@njc.ch>
* URL             : http://yapsnmp.sourceforge.net
* License         : LGPL
  Description     : SNMP client for Python

yapsnmp is a production-quality Python interface to the net-snmp
library.

=46rom the documentation:
     * Full MIB parsing, enabling you to use named OIDs as well as the
       numeric representations;
     * Support for SNMP version 1 and 2c (with 3 coming);
     * Supports GET, GETNEXT, GETBULK, SET and TRAPv2 (INFORM to come),
       as well as convenient "walk" and "table extraction" functions;
     * Uses the Single Session API and appropriate Python interpreter
       releases, rendering the module thread safe;
     * Offers a very high level interface, allowing easy SNMP
       integration into your code.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux play.smurf.noris.de 2.4.19-586tsc #1 Sun Oct 6 18:00:21 EST 2=
002 i686
Locale: LANG=3Den_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=3Dde_DE.utf8


--pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA+iZ0z8+hUANcKr/kRAkw/AJ9hzYKFf0ayXbw2CYR++3nT6w53wQCcCF+i
DN8mWJUXUTr5Lx1Vr4PvOLE=
=qddN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 187158-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Sep 2005 02:55:45 +0000
>From damog@cerdita.damog.net Wed Sep 14 19:55:45 2005
Return-path: <damog@cerdita.damog.net>
Received: from dsl-201-129-37-187.prod-infinitum.com.mx (cerdita.damog.net) [201.129.37.187] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EFjub-0001BS-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:55:45 -0700
Received: by cerdita.damog.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id E9C71107B52; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:12 -0500 (CDT)
To: 187158-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: WNPP bug closed
Message-Id: <20050915025512.E9C71107B52@cerdita.damog.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:12 -0500 (CDT)
From: damog@cerdita.damog.net (David Moreno Garza)
Delivered-To: 187158-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 301

Hello,

This is an automatic mail sent to close the RFP you have reported or 
are involved with.

Your RFP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 600 days.
- It haven't had any activity recently.
- The amount of ITPs on the Debian BTS is huge and we need to
  clean up a bit the place.

As this an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not 
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the RFP is still of your interest, or there has been 
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).

To re-open it, you simply have to mail control@bugs.debian.org
with a body text like this:

reopen 123456
thanks bts

Replacing '123456' for the number of your RFP bug. The subject of the
mail is ignored. Or if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <damog@debian.org>.

This is the first mass wnpp closing that will be done. The next close
will be done on inactive RFPs older than 450 days and finally, the
ones older than 365 days (an automatic script will close *inactive*
RFPs when they reach one year old).

A similar process is being applied to the ITP wnpp bugs in these
days.

Thanks for your cooperation,

 -- David Moreno Garza <damog@debian.org>  Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:54:42 -0500



Reply to: