Bug#93208: wnpp: RFP: peep, the "Network Auralizer"
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 12:45:01PM +0200, David Mart?nez Moreno wrote:
> El Domingo, 25 de Septiembre de 2005 23:12, Drew Scott Daniels escribi?:
[...]
> > I'm cc'ing the developers of peep. For the history of this bug see:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/93208
> >
> > I'd still be interested in seeing a Debian package of peep, the "Network
> > Auralizer". Javi, I don't understand what you mean by "for
> > log-interpretation I do prefer log-analys/logcheck". Can these be made
> > to output sounds?
> >
> > If anyone knows of a better "auralizer" that I could use for network/log
> > events, please let me know. I'd be happy to find a less complicated
> > alternative to peep (and thus have reason to re-close the request for
> > package bug 93208).
> >
> > Upstream development is stalled. The developers are responsive, but it
> > seems they don't have time to do many new developments [1]. I believe
> > they can be convinced to help out with licensing or compilation problems.
> >
> > [1]
> > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=8273164&forum_id=4626
>
> In fact, http://www.auralizer.com seems, like any other time I checked since
> two years ago or so, down with a Connection timed out.
>
Yes, I've noticed that too, but the sourceforge project is still active
(although the "homesite" points to auralizer.com). Google's cache allows
people to access some of the subpages on http://peep.sourceforge.net
Also, SourceForge seems to bounce my e-mail so I hope it picked up
yours.
Drew Daniels
Reply to: