Bug#275017: marked as done (RFP: amavisd-lite -- high performance, scalable mail filter for postfix)
Your message dated Sat, 08 Oct 2005 12:00:25 -0600
with message-id <E1EOIzh-0005ki-00@merkel.debian.org>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Oct 2004 14:12:10 +0000
>From submit@bugs.debian.org Tue Oct 05 07:12:10 2004
Return-path: <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Received: from li7-90.members.linode.com (randomnode.info) [64.62.231.90]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CEq2z-0004c9-00; Tue, 05 Oct 2004 07:12:09 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by randomnode.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28D1A4239E;
Tue, 5 Oct 2004 10:12:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from randomnode.info ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (laotzu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP
id 04549-01-2; Tue, 5 Oct 2004 10:12:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from socrates.dnsalias.org (200-171-244-111.customer.telesp.net.br [200.171.244.111])
by randomnode.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 880324239B;
Tue, 5 Oct 2004 10:12:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by socrates.dnsalias.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id 9E7E54C6C; Tue, 5 Oct 2004 11:11:54 -0300 (BRT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jeronimo Pellegrini <pellegrini@mpcnet.com.br>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: RFP: amavisd-lite -- high performance, scalable mail filter for postfix
Reply-To: Jeronimo Pellegrini <pellegrini@mpcnet.com.br>
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.99.5
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 11:11:54 -0300
Message-Id: <20041005141154.9E7E54C6C@socrates.dnsalias.org>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at randomnode.info
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,
RCVD_IN_DSBL autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : amavisd-lite
Version : 1.2
Upstream Author : Justin Boswell <jwb@ultrazone.org>
* URL : http://www.ultrazone.org/software/amavisd-lite/
* License : GPL
Description : high performance, scalable mail filter for postfix
amavisd-lite is a high performance, scalable mail filter for postfix
that does virus scanning, spam scanning (SpamAssassin), attachment
filename scanning, and per user whitelist/blacklists. It is designed
for use by ISPs and large email hosting providers. It is a complete
rewrite based on Mark Martinec's amavisd-new It is designed to be more
lightweight, with faster transaction times and less memory footprint
than amavisd-new, at the expense of a minor loss of some of
amavisd-new's flexibility.
amavisd-lite runs as an LMTP mail content filter. This allows it to
accept messages rapidly in from postfix, and insures that messages are
evaluated on a per-user basis, and that the MTA recieves a per-user
status for each message.
All settings for amavisd-lite are stored in SQL, making for quick and
easy integration and administration.
=====
Comment by package requestor:
I am using amavisd-new (sid version, backported on a woody box) in a
virtual UML server, and the memory usage is astronomic. It would really
be nice if Debian had amavisd-lite packaged.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (100, 'unstable'), (9, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-rc3
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=ISO-8859-1 (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 275017-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2005 18:00:26 +0000
>From damog@merkel.debian.org Sat Oct 08 11:00:26 2005
Return-path: <damog@merkel.debian.org>
Received: from merkel.debian.org [192.25.206.16] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EOIzh-0004nS-00; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 11:00:26 -0700
Received: from damog by merkel.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EOIzh-0005ki-00; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 12:00:25 -0600
To: 275017-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: WNPP bug closing
Message-Id: <E1EOIzh-0005ki-00@merkel.debian.org>
From: David Moreno Garza <damog@merkel.debian.org>
Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2005 12:00:25 -0600
Delivered-To: 275017-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Hello,
This is an automatic mail sent to close the RFP you have reported or
are involved with.
Your RFP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 365 days.
- It hasn't had any activity recently.
As this is an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the RFP is still of your interest, or there has been
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).
To re-open it, you simply have to mail control@bugs.debian.org
with a body text like this:
reopen 275017
thanks bts
Further comments on the work done in the bug sent to
275017@bugs.debian.org would be truly welcomed.
Anyway, if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <damog@debian.org>.
A similar process is being applied to other kind of wnpp bugs.
Thanks for your cooperation,
-- David Moreno Garza <damog@debian.org>.
Reply to: