Bug#316016: marked as done (ITA: lwp -- LWP thread library)
Your message dated Fri, 07 Oct 2005 15:40:46 -0700
with message-id <E1EO0tS-00073k-00@spohr.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#316016: fixed in lwp 2.1+debian-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jun 2005 22:41:27 +0000
>From jeroen@wolffelaar.nl Mon Jun 27 15:41:27 2005
Return-path: <jeroen@wolffelaar.nl>
Received: from 220pc220.sshunet.nl (mordor.wolffelaar.nl) [145.97.220.220] (Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dn2IA-0007OK-00; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 15:41:27 -0700
Received: from jeroen by mordor.wolffelaar.nl with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1Dn2I9-0004Hw-Si; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:41:25 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
X-Debbugs-CC: Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis <luca@debian.org>
Subject: O: lwp -- no description
X-MIA-Summary: Orphaning: lwp
Message-Id: <E1Dn2I9-0004Hw-Si@mordor.wolffelaar.nl>
From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <jeroen@wolffelaar.nl>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:41:25 +0200
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
The current maintainer of lwp, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis <luca@debian.org>,
is apparently not active anymore. Therefore, I orphan this package
now. If you want to be the new maintainer, please take it -- see
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/index.html#howto-o for detailed
instructions how to adopt a package properly.
Some information about this package:
Package: lwp
Binary: liblwp2-dev, liblwp2
Version: 1.9-3
Priority: optional
Section: misc
Maintainer: Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis <luca@debian.org>
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.15), libc6-dev (>= 2.2.4-4), libtool, autotools-dev
Architecture: alpha arm i386 m68k powerpc sparc
Standards-Version: 3.5.6
Format: 1.0
Directory: pool/main/l/lwp
Files: 0cceadc6f3c5834c9227ddfab13df28f 651 lwp_1.9-3.dsc
412eff7afff5ff3d945c416d77ebe6de 246655 lwp_1.9.orig.tar.gz
2aaa19f4d0e20af60fb435f51e609e6c 60292 lwp_1.9-3.diff.gz
Justification: No activity in 16 months, no response to pings
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 316016-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Oct 2005 22:48:19 +0000
>From joerg@spohr.debian.org Fri Oct 07 15:48:19 2005
Return-path: <joerg@spohr.debian.org>
Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EO0tS-00073k-00; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 15:40:46 -0700
From: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@panthera-systems.net>
To: 316016-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#316016: fixed in lwp 2.1+debian-1
Message-Id: <E1EO0tS-00073k-00@spohr.debian.org>
Sender: Joerg Jaspert <joerg@spohr.debian.org>
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 15:40:46 -0700
Delivered-To: 316016-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: lwp
Source-Version: 2.1+debian-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
lwp, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
liblwp-dev_2.1+debian-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/lwp/liblwp-dev_2.1+debian-1_i386.deb
liblwp2_2.1+debian-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/lwp/liblwp2_2.1+debian-1_i386.deb
lwp_2.1+debian-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/l/lwp/lwp_2.1+debian-1.diff.gz
lwp_2.1+debian-1.dsc
to pool/main/l/lwp/lwp_2.1+debian-1.dsc
lwp_2.1+debian.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/lwp/lwp_2.1+debian.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 316016@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@panthera-systems.net> (supplier of updated lwp package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 22:43:00 +0200
Source: lwp
Binary: liblwp2 liblwp-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.1+debian-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@panthera-systems.net>
Changed-By: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@panthera-systems.net>
Description:
liblwp-dev - Light Weight Processes library (development)
liblwp2 - Light Weight Processes library
Closes: 316016
Changes:
lwp (2.1+debian-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release.
* New maintainer (Closes: #316016).
* Rebuild upstream-tarball without conflicting debian-directory.
* Redone debian/.
Files:
ed3337d61c9cff986a21dbf57999c6d4 619 libs optional lwp_2.1+debian-1.dsc
21402c282ac03852392b6ede2281c701 362538 libs optional lwp_2.1+debian.orig.tar.gz
5ec18e6d6d98ccbb4f16d7fd04500845 14620 libs optional lwp_2.1+debian-1.diff.gz
295748660c9b61cbdbe1cb2ab4857343 24974 libs optional liblwp2_2.1+debian-1_i386.deb
daa83b111bd329072e146e5413ffc464 22218 libdevel optional liblwp-dev_2.1+debian-1_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDRaRYxa93SlhRC1oRAtltAJwNNYLdHQm7dnsBJhsf4bZmtyqLOQCgo+E8
iz5CsWAYl4DLpQqUuWvfWeI=
=WwkR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: