[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#303794: ITA: log4cpp -- A C++ library for flexible logging



Re: Fathi Boudra in <[🔎] 200509121553.06227.fboudra@free.fr>
> > 0) does it make sense to package 0.3.4b now when 0.3.5 is in
> > preparation by upstream?
> 
> the package was orphaned and the current version in debian is 0.2.8
> until 0.3.5 will be released, the current stable upstream is 0.3.4b
> Instead of waiting for the next stable upstream release, i prefer to try to 
> provide an updated package, more up-to-date than the 0.2.8 version.

Ok. I was just curious if you knew if the release would happen during
the next few weeks.

> > 1) why is the .orig.tar.gz different from the SF.net version?
> >
> > 60f1bf4eaf60a0ca45339b0b2a93abb9139a1fd8  o/log4cpp-0.3.4b.tar.gz
> > 34f5a316f621913f60766c6be9c2f237b4f1b7de  log4cpp_0.3.4b.orig.tar.gz
> 
> you're right, i have probably done a mistake in my packaging.
> the noted differences are the config.guess and config.sub

These should go into the .diff.gz (making it very large).

> > 2) debian/copyright does not mention the copyright itself (which is
> > something that looks like "(c) YYYY name <address>".
> 
> this line isn't correct ? :
> Copyright Holder: Bastiaan Bakker <bastiaan.bakker@lifeline.nl>

If that's what's in the source, yes. (Ideally, there would be
copyright years, but that's not really important.)

> > 6) wtf is that redirection for?
> > g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../include -I../include -g -O2 -Wall
> > -Wno-unused -pedantic -c FixedContextCategory.cpp -MT
> > FixedContextCategory.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/FixedContextCategory.TPlo -o
> > FixedContextCategory.o >/dev/null 2>&1
> 
> from the upstream release. need to investigate.

If upstream does it in that way, leave it as it is. It's still
braindead ;)

> you're the first one to review my package. Thanks for your reports.
> i'll correct my mistakes and can produce log4cpp 0.3.4b-2 or related to the 
> 1st point, can upgrade to 0.3.5rc3. what do you think of it ?

Either is fine, your choice.

Christoph
-- 
cb@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: