Processed: Let's remove aspseek (was Re: Is removal the only option for aspseek?)

To: Andrew Pollock <apollock@debian.org>
Cc: James Troup and others <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org>(ftp.debian.org #321328), <wnpp@debian.org>(wnpp #321328)
Subject: Processed: Let's remove aspseek (was Re: Is removal the only option for aspseek?)
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 04:18:15 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] handler.s.C.112643668913813.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <20050911110445.GA6558@daedalus.andrew.net.au>
References: <20050911110445.GA6558@daedalus.andrew.net.au>

Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> retitle 321328 RM: aspseek -- RoQA, RC bugs, licensing issues, dead upstream
Bug#321328: O: aspseek -- Advanced Internet search engine
Changed Bug title.

> reassign 321328 ftp.debian.org
Bug#321328: RM: aspseek -- RoQA, RC bugs, licensing issues, dead upstream
Bug reassigned from package `wnpp' to `ftp.debian.org'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Reply to:

Prev by Date: Bug#327605: Acknowledgement (ITP: plans -- A Good Web Calendar)
Next by Date: Processed: Let's remove all these GGZ Gaming Zone packages
Previous by thread: Bug#327605: Acknowledgement (ITP: plans -- A Good Web Calendar)
Next by thread: Processed: Let's remove all these GGZ Gaming Zone packages
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread