[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#301081: marked as done (ITP: mutt-ng -- Mutt next generation (mutt-ng) is a fork of the well-known email client mutt)



Your message dated Sat, 6 Aug 2005 15:20:11 -0600
with message-id <20050806212011.GA12681@merkel.debian.org>
and subject line Package exists in the archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Mar 2005 18:35:41 +0000
>From riesebie@lxtec.de Wed Mar 23 10:35:41 2005
Return-path: <riesebie@lxtec.de>
Received: from h01.hostsharing.net (pima.hostsharing.net) [212.42.230.152] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DEAhg-0002QE-00; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 10:35:40 -0800
Received: from mail.home.lxtec.de (pD9ECE862.dip.t-dialin.net [217.236.232.98])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pima.hostsharing.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDC9AD0ACD
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 19:35:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
	by mail.home.lxtec.de with esmtp (Exim 4.50 1 (LXTEC))
	id 1DEAhd-00060B-Ct
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 19:35:37 +0100
Received: from mail.home.lxtec.de ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (baumbart [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 22736-06 for <submit@bugs.debian.org>;
	Wed, 23 Mar 2005 19:35:35 +0100 (CET)
Received: from frodo.home.lxtec.de ([192.168.200.202])
	by mail.home.lxtec.de with esmtps (Exim 4.50 1 (LXTEC))
	id 1DEAhb-000604-EI
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 19:35:35 +0100
Received: from riesebie by frodo.home.lxtec.de with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1DEAhb-0005JH-8c
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 19:35:35 +0100
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 19:35:35 +0100
From: Elimar Riesebieter <riesebie@lxtec.de>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: ITP: mutt-ng -- Mutt next generation (mutt-ng) is a fork of the well-known email client mutt
Message-ID: <20050323183535.GA20365@frodo.home.lxtec.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UugvWAfsgieZRqgk"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, nion@ngolde.de, tretkowski@inittab.de
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8+lxtec-i
Sender: Elimar Riesebieter <riesebie@lxtec.de>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at home.lxtec.de
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
	X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--UugvWAfsgieZRqgk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Elimar Riesebieter <riesebie@lxtec.de>

* Package name    : mutt-ng
  Version         : x.y.z
  Upstream Author : Name <somebody@example.org>
* URL             : http://www.example.org/
* License         : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.)
  Description     : Mutt next generation (mutt-ng) is a fork of the well-kn=
own email client mutt

(Include the long description here.)

Mutt next generation (mutt-ng) is a fork of the well-known email client mutt
 with the goal to both incorporate all the patches that are floating around=
 in
 the web, and to fix all the other little annoyances of mutt.
 .
 Differences between mutt and mutt-ng:
  o Better view support for format=3Dflowed attachments
  o Message IDs are configurable
  o User can set signoff_string just like in slrn
  o User can call up the "last folder" when saving attachments
  o IMAP reconnecting: when the connection to the IMAP server dies, mutt-ng
    attempts reconnecting
  o User can set the umask with which all the files shall be created (was
    hard-coded before, and caused huge problems for shared mailboxes to some
    people)
  o Support for NNTP, i.e. mutt-ng can be used as a newsreader
  o A sidebar similar to other (graphical) MUAs where you can directly jump
    to a certain mailbox

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.5-frodo
Locale: LANG=3Dde_DE@euro, LC_CTYPE=3Dde_DE@euro (charmap=3DISO-8859-15)

mutt-ng is an incredible solution on top of the famous mutt mailer.
Please feel free to test the Debian mutt-ng binaries found at
http://www.lxtec.de/debarchiv/sources/mutt-ng/ which incudes further inform=
ation
as well.

http://www.mutt-ng.org

Ciao

Elimar

--=20
  Never make anything simple and efficient when a way=20
  can be found to make it complex and wonderful ;-)

--UugvWAfsgieZRqgk
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD4DBQFCQbb33Ig8bsVPf7ARAihkAJ48qBXkFUOu1jmWlr1r87AWEHKf/ACVHTEb
2Qy3o/gWGJaUCORo3LhkYg==
=LdAH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--UugvWAfsgieZRqgk--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 301081-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Aug 2005 21:20:14 +0000
>From tbm@merkel.debian.org Sat Aug 06 14:20:14 2005
Return-path: <tbm@merkel.debian.org>
Received: from merkel.debian.org [192.25.206.16] (mail)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1E1W5V-0004ia-00; Sat, 06 Aug 2005 14:20:13 -0700
Received: from tbm by merkel.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1E1W5T-0003Ik-00; Sat, 06 Aug 2005 15:20:11 -0600
Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 15:20:11 -0600
From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
To: 301081-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Package exists in the archive
Message-ID: <20050806212011.GA12681@merkel.debian.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Sender: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@merkel.debian.org>
Delivered-To: 301081-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

It seems that this package already exists in the archive.  If you have
uploaded the package yourself but forgotten to close this WNPP bug, please
read the instructions at http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp for handling
WNPP bugs properly.  You should close WNPP bugs in your initial upload
with a statement like "Initial upload. (Closes: #301081)".  Thanks.
Of course, it might also be that someone else uploading this package,
in which case the statements above don't apply -- in any case, the package
seems to be in the archive now.

Information about the package already in the archive:

Package: mutt-ng
Binary: mutt-ng
Version: 0.0+20050728-1
Priority: optional
Section: mail
Maintainer: Elimar Riesebieter <riesebie@lxtec.de>
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.1.16), libncursesw5-dev, libsasl2-dev, libgnutls11-dev, libidn11-dev, linuxdoc-tools-text, gettext, groff, dpatch, automake1.7, libqdbm-dev
Architecture: any
Standards-Version: 3.6.2
Format: 1.0
Directory: pool/main/m/mutt-ng
Files: 2f0cfaef96d1595a54332a219fb2065b 763 mutt-ng_0.0+20050728-1.dsc
 322a2dd1e4e9c78c2e974429f75ff4c8 2441549 mutt-ng_0.0+20050728.orig.tar.gz
 07baf1258e345604b435c8dfd5940c79 21458 mutt-ng_0.0+20050728-1.diff.gz
Uploaders: Nico Golde <nico@ngolde.de>

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/



Reply to: