[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#317430: marked as done (ITP: apt-history -- logs the changes when installing)

Your message dated Sat, 9 Jul 2005 13:47:59 +0200
with message-id <20050709114759.GB14834@ngolde.de>
and subject line Bug#317430: ITP: apt-history -- logs the changes when installing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jul 2005 12:03:45 +0000
>From nico@ngolde.de Fri Jul 08 05:03:45 2005
Return-path: <nico@ngolde.de>
Received: from modprobe.de (h4447.serverkompetenz.net) [] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1Dqra5-0006uK-00; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 05:03:45 -0700
Received: by h4447.serverkompetenz.net (Postfix, from userid 1003)
	id 38B80434108; Fri,  8 Jul 2005 14:03:32 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Nico Golde <nico@ngolde.de>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: ITP: apt-history -- logs the changes when installing
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 14:03:32 +0200
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Message-Id: <[🔎] 20050708120332.38B80434108@h4447.serverkompetenz.net>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
	X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nico Golde <nico@ngolde.de>

* Package name    : apt-history
  Version         : 0.1
  Upstream Author : Vittorio Palmisano <redclay@email.it>
* URL             : http://redclay.altervista.org/archivio/python/apt-history/
* License         : GPL
  Description     : logs the changes when installing

apt-history logs the changes of /var/lib/dpkg/status when installing,
removing, upgrading packages with apt-get

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.29
Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Received: (at 317430-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jul 2005 11:47:12 +0000
>From nico@ngolde.de Sat Jul 09 04:47:12 2005
Return-path: <nico@ngolde.de>
Received: from natnoddy.rzone.de [] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DrDnc-00036P-00; Sat, 09 Jul 2005 04:47:12 -0700
Received: from ngolde.de (Ga876.g.pppool.de [])
	by post.webmailer.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j69BlABu028588;
	Sat, 9 Jul 2005 13:47:10 +0200 (MEST)
Received: by ngolde.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id BEEA05D40A9; Sat,  9 Jul 2005 13:47:59 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 13:47:59 +0200
From: Nico Golde <nico@ngolde.de>
To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Cc: 317430-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#317430: ITP: apt-history -- logs the changes when installing
Message-ID: <20050709114759.GB14834@ngolde.de>
Mail-Followup-To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,
References: <[🔎] 20050708234922.GA15514@zulo.hadrons.org> <[🔎] 20050709001422.GD3375@ngolde.de> <[🔎] 20050709063407.GC2973@hades.evilgeniuses.org.uk> <[🔎] 20050709100654.GA3317@ngolde.de> <[🔎] 20050709105522.GA12639@debian> <[🔎] 20050709105522.GA12639@debian> <[🔎] 20050709110423.GF3317@ngolde.de> <E1DrD92-0001CU-00@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <20050709111224.GG3317@ngolde.de> <20050709112303.GA14183@debian>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MfFXiAuoTsnnDAfZ"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050709112303.GA14183@debian>
X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 6.3 (2004 June 7, compiled Jun 15 2005 18:17:41)
X-Mailer: Mutt-ng http://www.muttng.org
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux sid
X-My-Homepage: http://www.ngolde.de
User-Agent: mutt-ng devel-20050619 (Debian)
Delivered-To: 317430-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hallo Eduard,

* Eduard Bloch <edi@gmx.de> [2005-07-09 13:44]:
> #include <hallo.h>
> * Nico Golde [Sat, Jul 09 2005, 01:12:24PM]:
> > > Coreutils is required. Why is the ability to do something without it =
> > > advantage?
> >=20
> > You can do almost every thing with with tools like, grep,
> > sed, awk etc. but in my opinion this should be so easy as
> > possible to everyone. Not everybody is familiar with grep
> > etc. but apt-history show should be no problem.
> a) a system administrator has to be familiar with grep (don't throw in
> FUD like "awk, etc.", those are tools for people that like them).
> Learning grep's usage for this purpose is not much more complicated than
> learning apt-history's usage.

I don't talk about real administrators, I talk about users
with su permissions.

> b) it is a problem for _everyone_ if you create a _new_ package, which
> eats up disk space with its meta data and kills apt's performance for no
> good reason

Ok it seems that I am the only one interrested in this
package. I will close the bug.
Thanks for your help!
Regards Nico
Nico Golde - JAB: nion@jabber.ccc.de | GPG: 0x73647CFF
http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org=20
VIM has two modes - the one in which it beeps=20
and the one in which it doesn't -- encrypted mail preferred

Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)



Reply to: