[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#297425: marked as done (ITA: iozone3 -- Filesystem and Disk Benchmarking Tool)



Your message dated Sat, 07 May 2005 22:32:07 -0400
with message-id <E1DUbaR-00040c-00@newraff.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#297425: fixed in iozone3 226-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Feb 2005 19:11:10 +0000
>From kmr@debian.org Mon Feb 28 11:11:10 2005
Return-path: <kmr@debian.org>
Received: from (boa.b9.com) [216.184.11.2] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1D5qIQ-0001sL-00; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:11:10 -0800
Received: from tiger.med-info.com (tiger.med-info.com [216.184.11.129])
	by boa.b9.com (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with SMTP id j1SJAdRm023601
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:10:39 -0700
Received: from tiger.med-info.com (kevin@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by tiger.med-info.com (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-7) with ESMTP id j1SJAd3n002310
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:10:39 -0700
Received: (from kevin@localhost)
	by tiger.med-info.com (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j1SJAdsO002307;
	Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:10:39 -0700
Message-Id: <200502281910.j1SJAdsO002307@tiger.med-info.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: tiger.med-info.com: kevin set sender to kmr@debian.org using -f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Kevin M. Rosenberg" <kmr@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: O: iozone3 -- Filesystem and Disk Benchmarking Tool
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:10:39 -0700
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 172.16.1.2
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: wnpp
Severity: normal


I intend to orphan the iozone3 package.

The package description is:
 Iozone is useful for determining a broad benchmark of filesystem
 performance. The benchmark tests file I/O performance for the
 following operations: Read, write, re-read, re-write, read backwards,
 read strided, fread, fwrite, random read/write, pread/pwrite variants.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 297425-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 May 2005 02:49:32 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Sat May 07 19:49:32 2005
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DUbrI-0000SO-00; Sat, 07 May 2005 19:49:32 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DUbaR-00040c-00; Sat, 07 May 2005 22:32:07 -0400
From: smr@debian.org (Steve M. Robbins)
To: 297425-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#297425: fixed in iozone3 226-3
Message-Id: <E1DUbaR-00040c-00@newraff.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Sat, 07 May 2005 22:32:07 -0400
Delivered-To: 297425-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: iozone3
Source-Version: 226-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
iozone3, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

iozone3_226-3.diff.gz
  to pool/non-free/i/iozone3/iozone3_226-3.diff.gz
iozone3_226-3.dsc
  to pool/non-free/i/iozone3/iozone3_226-3.dsc
iozone3_226-3_i386.deb
  to pool/non-free/i/iozone3/iozone3_226-3_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 297425@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Steve M. Robbins <smr@debian.org> (supplier of updated iozone3 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat,  7 May 2005 01:16:24 -0400
Source: iozone3
Binary: iozone3
Architecture: source i386
Version: 226-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Steve M. Robbins <smr@debian.org>
Changed-By: Steve M. Robbins <smr@debian.org>
Description: 
 iozone3    - Filesystem and Disk Benchmarking Tool
Closes: 297425
Changes: 
 iozone3 (226-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New maintainer.  Closes: #297425.
Files: 
 6df04e483a9fd36ca77adea111e80739 557 non-free/utils optional iozone3_226-3.dsc
 d6daa4bb2f7d55dc83b8f607fba13abd 4918 non-free/utils optional iozone3_226-3.diff.gz
 76868a4df458997db9e03c22ad40cd74 371184 non-free/utils optional iozone3_226-3_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCfXhh0i2bPSHbMcURAgRpAKCTv6a6MXt9bqJ59ANGCtyYFSDBigCdEznQ
6QX5Y2AqEq2QsbBUn+BLlww=
=TSx7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: