[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#302298: marked as done (ITA: jbofihe -- Lojban glosser/parser)



Your message dated Tue, 12 Apr 2005 20:53:34 -0700
with message-id <1113364414.23710.11.camel@localhost>
and subject line Adopted
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Mar 2005 05:21:21 +0000
>From taral@taral.net Wed Mar 30 21:21:21 2005
Return-path: <taral@taral.net>
Received: from yzma.clarkk.net [66.219.50.42] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DGs7N-0001Es-00; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 21:21:21 -0800
Received: by yzma.clarkk.net (Postfix, from userid 666)
	id AD77E33E96; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 23:21:20 -0600 (CST)
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 23:21:20 -0600
From: Taral <taral@taral.net>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: O: jbofihe -- Lojban glosser/parser
Message-ID: <20050331052120.GB26103@yzma.clarkk.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

-- 
Taral <taral@taral.net>
This message is digitally signed. Please PGP encrypt mail to me.
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 302298-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Apr 2005 03:53:03 +0000
>From treed@surreality.us Tue Apr 12 20:53:03 2005
Return-path: <treed@surreality.us>
Received: from 70-32-97-160.ontrca.adelphia.net (localhost) [70.32.97.160] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DLYw2-0004ZT-00; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 20:53:03 -0700
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1DLYwZ-0004S6-98
	for 302298-done@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 20:53:35 -0700
Subject: Adopted
From: Theodore Reed <treed@surreality.us>
To: 302298-done@bugs.debian.org
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-7tQ3DSFEkcb2U6FHZO+5"
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 20:53:34 -0700
Message-Id: <1113364414.23710.11.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 
Delivered-To: 302298-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--=-7tQ3DSFEkcb2U6FHZO+5
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

With the sponsorship of John Leuner, I have adopted this package. The
new version (0.38-1) was accepted into unstable yesterday. Would have
closed this bug with it, but didn't notice that it was actually orphaned
officially until after I sent John the patch for review. Closing it now.
--=20
Theodore Reed <treed@surreality.us>

--=-7tQ3DSFEkcb2U6FHZO+5
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBCXJe+w24JwM4aDNwRAnW5AJ0asWEe+MZd5Sg4U4Qs4gtemQ5yKQCePM1S
8c6rayfv9kGI0R0oBnpZ5MQ=
=DgCA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-7tQ3DSFEkcb2U6FHZO+5--



Reply to: