Bug#130637: marked as done (RFP: tea -- mail encryption on the mailserver)
Your message dated Fri, 8 Apr 2005 06:04:48 -0600
with message-id <20050408120448.GA23486@merkel.debian.org>
and subject line Package exist in Debian now
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jan 2002 09:00:31 +0000
>From TilleA@rki.de Thu Jan 24 03:00:31 2002
Return-path: <TilleA@rki.de>
Received: from augsburg.bund.de (Augsburg.ivbb.bund.de) [194.95.179.209]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16TfkE-0002XC-00; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 03:00:31 -0600
Received: (from root@localhost)
by Augsburg.ivbb.bund.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA22061
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 09:59:58 +0100
From: Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: RFP: tea -- mail encryption on the mailserver
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.41.14213
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.41.14213
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 09:59:23 +0100
Message-Id: <E16TfjA-0007Ps-00@wr-linux02>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-01-24
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : tea
Version : 0.6-beta
Upstream Author : Tom Vogt <tom at lemuria dot org>
* URL : http://freshmeat.net/projects/tea/
* License : non-free (see below, not sure if we can distribute it)
Description : mail encryption on the mailserver
I was asked to include this into a med-email-server meta package and
so I would like to have this package included. I personally do not
like the license nor the fact that the upstream source was not changed
since Dec 1999.
LICENSE:
TEA is Free Software, but not freeware or public domain. The following
license outlines what you may or may not do. If you do not accept the
license, you have none of the rights granted by it, which pretty much means
the only right you have is to keep a copy of TEA on your harddisk, without
even looking at it.
If you are a private individual, you may use TEA without any fee or charge,
and you may copy and distribute it as long as you only distribute complete,
unmodified copies and grant everyone you give a copy of TEA all the rights
of this license. You may not charge a fee for TEA.
If you are a corporation, a government or any other thing aside from a
private individual, you have the same rights as above, except that you must
pay a one-time fee of your own choice. Yes, I am serious. You decide how much
you pay. Make up your mind as to what TEA is worth to you, and pay me that
amount. I do not care whether this is $0.40 or $50k - I *do* care whether you
honestly believe this is what it's worth.
No matter who you are, you ARE allowed - and even encouraged - to examine the
sourcecode and make changes to TEA for your own purposes ONLY.
you may NOT distribute these changes or the modified software without my
written (gpg-signed e-mail counts) consent.
I *do* encourage you to send me any patches or bugfixes (especially fixes),
but if you want to distribute a modified version, or integrate TEA into a
product you sell, or anything else that amounts to a change being distributed,
you must talk to me first, ok?
Do I have to mention that there's no warrenty of any kind on this software?
Trapdoor: If you are a lawyer, accepting this license either for yourself or
your client, or an acceptance of this license by your client, automatically
designates a decision to follow the SPIRIT of this license first, and the
LETTER second. In case of doubt, you agree that I know better what the
spirit is, since I wrote the damn thing.
Tom Vogt
<tom@lemuria.org>
December 1999
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux wr-linux02 2.4.17 #1 Mit Jan 23 14:00:21 CET 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=de_DE@euro, LC_CTYPE=de_DE@euro
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 130637-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Apr 2005 12:04:52 +0000
>From tbm@merkel.debian.org Fri Apr 08 05:04:51 2005
Return-path: <tbm@merkel.debian.org>
Received: from merkel.debian.org [192.25.206.16] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DJsEF-00076l-00; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 05:04:51 -0700
Received: from tbm by merkel.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DJsEC-00067x-00; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 06:04:48 -0600
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 06:04:48 -0600
From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
To: 130637-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Package exist in Debian now
Message-ID: <20050408120448.GA23486@merkel.debian.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@merkel.debian.org>
Delivered-To: 130637-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
It seems that the package you have requested now exists in the
Debian archive.
Information about the package:
Package: tea
Binary: tea
Version: 7.0-1
Priority: optional
Section: editors
Maintainer: Lior Kaplan <webmaster@guides.co.il>
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), libaspell-dev, libgtk2.0-dev
Architecture: any
Standards-Version: 3.6.1
Format: 1.0
Directory: pool/main/t/tea
Files: ebf748c4a7e46a47e59195ef7594fc85 573 tea_7.0-1.dsc
9c659f2a4caae3b969304bae6f643b78 396692 tea_7.0.orig.tar.gz
975752ed658417eb9ab45a1edefcf814 10426 tea_7.0-1.diff.gz
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
Reply to: