Bug#298117: marked as done (ITP: camlrpc -- Ocaml Sun RPC libraries)
Your message dated Thu, 07 Apr 2005 14:03:18 -0400
with message-id <E1DJbLa-0006R1-00@newraff.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#298117: fixed in camlrpc 0.4.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Mar 2005 20:42:16 +0000
>From thomas.petazzoni@enix.org Fri Mar 04 12:42:16 2005
Return-path: <thomas.petazzoni@enix.org>
Received: from humanoidz.org (crazy.kos.nx) [82.237.107.242]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D7Jcm-0003yP-00; Fri, 04 Mar 2005 12:42:16 -0800
Received: from thomas by crazy.kos.nx with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1D7JcE-0002km-00
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 04 Mar 2005 21:41:42 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@enix.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: ITP: camlrpc -- Ocaml Sun RPC libraries
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 21:41:42 +0100
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Message-Id: <E1D7JcE-0002km-00@crazy.kos.nx>
Sender: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@enix.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@enix.org>
* Package name : camlrpc
Version : 0.4.1
Upstream Author : Gerd Stolpmann <gerd@gerd-stolpmann.de>
* URL : http://www.ocaml-programming.de/programming/rpc.html
* License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.)
Description : Ocaml Sun RPC libraries
RPC is a package supporting the Sun RPC protocol. RPC programs,
procedures, clients, and servers can be dynamically represented and
modified. Of course, there is also a classical RPC generator which
generates functions doing the language mapping from XDR values to
language values and vice versa.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10
Locale: LANG=fr_FR, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 298117-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Apr 2005 18:08:02 +0000
>From joerg@newraff.debian.org Thu Apr 07 11:08:02 2005
Return-path: <joerg@newraff.debian.org>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DJbQA-0002e1-00; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 11:08:02 -0700
Received: from joerg by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DJbLa-0006R1-00; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 14:03:18 -0400
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@enix.org>
To: 298117-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#298117: fixed in camlrpc 0.4.1-5
Message-Id: <E1DJbLa-0006R1-00@newraff.debian.org>
Sender: Joerg Jaspert <joerg@newraff.debian.org>
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 14:03:18 -0400
Delivered-To: 298117-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Source: camlrpc
Source-Version: 0.4.1-5
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
camlrpc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
camlrpc_0.4.1-5.diff.gz
to pool/main/c/camlrpc/camlrpc_0.4.1-5.diff.gz
camlrpc_0.4.1-5.dsc
to pool/main/c/camlrpc/camlrpc_0.4.1-5.dsc
camlrpc_0.4.1.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/c/camlrpc/camlrpc_0.4.1.orig.tar.gz
librpc-ocaml-dev_0.4.1-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/c/camlrpc/librpc-ocaml-dev_0.4.1-5_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 298117@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@enix.org> (supplier of updated camlrpc package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 17:08:09 +0100
Source: camlrpc
Binary: librpc-ocaml-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.4.1-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers <debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@enix.org>
Description:
librpc-ocaml-dev - Ocaml Sun RPC libraries
Closes: 298117
Changes:
camlrpc (0.4.1-5) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New correct description in debian/control.
* No more debian/dirs.
* No more debian/librpc-ocaml-dev.dirs.
* Updated Standards-Version to 3.6.1.1.
* First public release, closes: #298117.
Files:
bf0209b1be9be5c2a05ea84eaacf8a37 727 devel optional camlrpc_0.4.1-5.dsc
06db99ad4db9532d01dda8df60bf3cd9 153659 devel optional camlrpc_0.4.1.orig.tar.gz
34c89ab90903d7c8063ad65d6dc3d921 3975 devel optional camlrpc_0.4.1-5.diff.gz
d35f58ace90cb68e2e9f441c35e9d3dc 773348 libdevel optional librpc-ocaml-dev_0.4.1-5_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCKXiHIae1O4AJae8RAoBQAJsEaEgxnwIKkCfxeGngVVQmYEw9hwCfb/LF
uXZU+Gvz81PxQDUQlvCsHiI=
=KGV8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: