On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 04:18:56PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > PS: I see trouble coming. The package uses openssl but also the fuse > > library which is licensed under the GPL (without the OpenSSL remark). So > > the only way around this is: > > > > - replace openssl with gcrypt or such > > - add an exception to the GPL license of fuse (permission to link with > > OpenSSL) > > Permission granted :) > > Do I need to put it in some magic licence file in future releases? I've just asked on #debian-devel and here's what I got: http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/05/msg00595.html http://www.gnome.org/~markmc/openssl-and-the-gpl.html Also if there were some contributions (and according to changelog there were) you should ask contributors for the change of license. regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:fenio@debian.org | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:fenio@jabber.org | rlu:172001
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature