On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 02:43:49PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote: > I (lufs-cryptofs maintainer) support it! lufs-cryptofs is nice but needs > to be audited and I do not like the code, especially because LUFS is > dead upstream. encfs seems to be much better, and I want to get rid of > CFS (that I currently use) RSN. > > So someone should step out and package encfs. I could do in some weeks > (when I have more time) but if somebody else packages it before me, I > would like to sponsor it (if needed). > > IMO fuse-encfs would be an appropriate package name. As a fuse maintainer all I can say that _right now_ encfs can't be packaged, cause it needs 2.2 version of fuse which is waiting for ftp-master approval for more than two months now. I tried to contact ftp-masters about that but without success. Otherwise I see no reason to not package it, since fuse is considered as a future user-space way to add new filesystems. regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:fenio@debian.org | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:fenio@jabber.org | rlu:172001
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature