Bug#288081: who wants to package it?!

[Eduard Bloch <edi@gmx.de>]

Hello

I (lufs-cryptofs maintainer) support it! lufs-cryptofs is nice but needs
to be audited and I do not like the code, especially because LUFS is
dead upstream. encfs seems to be much better, and I want to get rid of
CFS (that I currently use) RSN.

So someone should step out and package encfs. I could do in some weeks
(when I have more time) but if somebody else packages it before me, I
would like to sponsor it (if needed).

IMO fuse-encfs would be an appropriate package name.

Regards,
Eduard.
-- 
Hauptsache es geht vorwärts - die Richtung ist egal.