[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#297385: marked as done (O: cl-readline - Common Lisp interface to the GNU readline library)



Your message dated Tue, 01 Mar 2005 17:32:54 -0500
with message-id <E1D6FvC-0001OB-00@newraff.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#297385: fixed in cl-rsm-memo 1.1.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Feb 2005 18:52:25 +0000
>From kmr@debian.org Mon Feb 28 10:52:25 2005
Return-path: <kmr@debian.org>
Received: from (boa.b9.com) [216.184.11.2] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1D5q0H-00079U-00; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:52:25 -0800
Received: from tiger.med-info.com (tiger.med-info.com [216.184.11.129])
	by boa.b9.com (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with SMTP id j1SIpsLn020264
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:51:54 -0700
Received: from tiger.med-info.com (kevin@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by tiger.med-info.com (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-7) with ESMTP id j1SIpslW031792
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:51:54 -0700
Received: (from kevin@localhost)
	by tiger.med-info.com (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j1SIpsgw031789;
	Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:51:54 -0700
Message-Id: <200502281851.j1SIpsgw031789@tiger.med-info.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: tiger.med-info.com: kevin set sender to kmr@debian.org using -f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Kevin M. Rosenberg" <kmr@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: O: cl-readline - Common Lisp interface to the GNU readline library
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:51:54 -0700
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 172.16.1.2
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: wnpp
Severity: normal


I intend to orphan cl-readline

 This package uses UFFI to provide an interface to the GNU readline
 library for Common Lisp programs.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 297385-close) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Mar 2005 22:39:33 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Tue Mar 01 14:39:32 2005
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1D6G1c-0003ED-00; Tue, 01 Mar 2005 14:39:32 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1D6FvC-0001OB-00; Tue, 01 Mar 2005 17:32:54 -0500
From: Peter Van Eynde <pvaneynd@debian.org>
To: 297385-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#297385: fixed in cl-rsm-memo 1.1.2
Message-Id: <E1D6FvC-0001OB-00@newraff.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 17:32:54 -0500
Delivered-To: 297385-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: cl-rsm-memo
Source-Version: 1.1.2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
cl-rsm-memo, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

cl-rsm-memo_1.1.2.dsc
  to pool/main/c/cl-rsm-memo/cl-rsm-memo_1.1.2.dsc
cl-rsm-memo_1.1.2.tar.gz
  to pool/main/c/cl-rsm-memo/cl-rsm-memo_1.1.2.tar.gz
cl-rsm-memo_1.1.2_all.deb
  to pool/main/c/cl-rsm-memo/cl-rsm-memo_1.1.2_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 297385@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Peter Van Eynde <pvaneynd@debian.org> (supplier of updated cl-rsm-memo package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue,  1 Mar 2005 10:18:05 +0100
Source: cl-rsm-memo
Binary: cl-rsm-memo
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.1.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Peter Van Eynde <pvaneynd@debian.org>
Changed-By: Peter Van Eynde <pvaneynd@debian.org>
Description: 
 cl-rsm-memo - McIntire's Common Lisp Memoization Library
Closes: 297385
Changes: 
 cl-rsm-memo (1.1.2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New maintainer. (Closes: #297385: O: cl-readline - Common Lisp
     interface to the GNU readline library)
   * Adopted by Peter Van Eynde
Files: 
 20ba8d2a7b2434b91e04687014dc50e2 513 devel optional cl-rsm-memo_1.1.2.dsc
 12377f7f8ea4b0a48a5bab644a7f1240 7541 devel optional cl-rsm-memo_1.1.2.tar.gz
 3327e99b3b9c7ea187d7ed98e7d7a25f 7828 devel optional cl-rsm-memo_1.1.2_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCJJzr11ldN0tyliURAsAAAKC3SrlL4tW3CROliwtQVPRdgoekPwCgqnEt
v5pZlwD907sY0BVmocYysns=
=Lwct
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: