Bug#288379: VCG, license, and source location
- To: Jens Peter Secher <jps@debian.org>
- Cc: 288379@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#288379: VCG, license, and source location
- From: Ian Zimmerman <itz@buug.org>
- Date: 02 Feb 2005 22:13:47 -0800
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87mzumcgro.fsf@buug.org>
- Reply-to: Ian Zimmerman <itz@buug.org>, 288379@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <87651njxtl.fsf@buug.org>
- References: <41DBE55D.9030201@jones.dk> <20050106154520.GA15850@rene-engelhard.de> <41DD7C20.2040709@jones.dk> <20050106181648.GC15850@rene-engelhard.de> <41F37986.7090406@jones.dk> <20050123154553.GE25355@rene-engelhard.de> <87oefghy6c.fsf@buug.org> <878y6jsrq6.fsf_-_@83.73.128.1.ip.tele2adsl.dk> <87651njxtl.fsf@buug.org>
Jens> How about putting the DFSG/GPL-compatible source on Savanna (or
Jens> similar), so that there is a (new) canonical place to get VCG. Of
Jens> course, politely ask the original authors about their opinion
Jens> first.
Ian> I'm writing on behalf of the Debian project. We'd like to keep vcg
Ian> as a Debian package, however, Debian procedures require us to keep
Ian> an intact upstream source package (under a free license) plus
Ian> Debian patches. In the case of vcg, that is not trivial because
Ian> the free (unobfuscated) version of the layout sources has only been
Ian> released separately from the rest of the package.
Ian> Since vcg doesn't seem to be actively developed anymore by you,
Ian> would you object if we fork a version and maintain it on Savannah,
Ian> SourceForge or a similar community site? Legally there is no
Ian> problem because it's under GPL, but you must be given proper human
Ian> consideration.
Well, it has been over a week now, so I feel justified in taking over
the upstream if necessary.
Ian> graphviz. graphviz can do many of the same things vcg can, and
Ian> seems to be more widely used. And, after seeing the vcg source,
Ian> graphviz is probably easier to maintain <grin>
It seems graphviz has indeed entered main (I am not sure because I track
testing, but I'll know in two weeks). So maintaining vcg may not be
worth the effort.
I'll keep you updated ...
--
I wonder which is the best virus for unix and if I can write
a better one in Microsoft BASIC ?
Hans-Marc Olsen in comp.unix.programmer
Reply to: