Bug#167504: marked as done (ITP: rlab -- a numerical analisys tool like Matlab)
Your message dated Sun, 19 Dec 2004 17:30:07 -0800
with message-id <200412191730.15863.dburrows@debian.org>
and subject line no longer relevant
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Nov 2002 23:10:30 +0000
>From zufus@zufus.org Sat Nov 02 17:10:30 2002
Return-path: <zufus@zufus.org>
Received: from smtp2.libero.it [193.70.192.52]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 1887PR-00043n-00; Sat, 02 Nov 2002 17:10:30 -0600
Received: from zufus.org (62.98.194.20) by smtp2.libero.it (6.5.028)
id 3DBB5F3D00374BFC for submit@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 3 Nov 2002 00:09:59 +0100
Received: by zufus.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 07B0A21F; Sun, 3 Nov 2002 00:03:48 +0100 (CET)
From: Marco Presi (Zufus) <zufus@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: ITP: rlab -- a numerical analisys tool like Matlab
X-Debbugs-CC: Marco Presi (Zufus) <zufus@debian.org>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Message-Id: <20021102230348.07B0A21F@zufus.org>
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2002 00:03:48 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : rlab
Version :
Upstream Author : Name <somebody@some.org>
* URL : http://www.some.org/
* License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.)
Description : rlab is a numerical analisys tool like Matlab
Do someone like to have this package in Debian?
REgards
Marco
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 84040-done) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Dec 2004 04:09:35 +0000
>From dburrows@debian.org Sun Dec 19 20:09:35 2004
Return-path: <dburrows@debian.org>
Received: from f05s05.cac.psu.edu (authsmtp.psu.edu) [128.118.141.48]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CgErW-0001pW-00; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 20:09:34 -0800
Received: from ip6-localhost (phillies.swift.psu.edu [128.118.69.166])
(authenticated bits=0)
by authsmtp.psu.edu (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id iBK49SB1022786
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT)
for <84040-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 23:09:29 -0500
From: Daniel Burrows <dburrows@debian.org>
To: 84040-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: no longer relevant
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 17:30:07 -0800
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="nextPart1789195.ZKs0k4t00D";
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200412191730.15863.dburrows@debian.org>
Delivered-To: 84040-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--nextPart1789195.ZKs0k4t00D
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
This software seems to be dead upstream, and I think it may be superceded=
by=20
r-base. In any event, I'm no longer interested in it.
Daniel
=2D-=20
/------------------- Daniel Burrows <dburrows@debian.org> -----------------=
=2D\
| "Hmm, do I understand correctly that we've introduced a 1970 bug in =
|
| order to move the 2038 bug to 2106?" =
|
| -- Richard Braakman =
|
\------------ Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org -- Because. ----------=
=2D/
--nextPart1789195.ZKs0k4t00D
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBBxisnch6xsM7kSXgRArJ0AKCl99KU+QmbQVBRRFp5agPxvsMtbgCg25Dx
p4UGXRGn9b6jzm5k8yld8T0=
=vww5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart1789195.ZKs0k4t00D--
Reply to: