Hi,
Ari Pollak:
> Isn't there already a gimp-dcraw package to do the exact same thing but
> is more mature? Does UFRaw have any advantages over dcraw? Does it open
> different kinds of images?
>
ufraw has a preview image and lots of options.
gimp-dcraw is a bare-bones import without preview and with too few
options -- using it is hit-and-miss and the results still require
some postprocessing in the gimp.
> > ufraw has lots of preprocessing options which seem to duplicate gimp's
> > features. Unfortunatey, they are necessary because its 8-bit limitation
> > would cause major quality problems.
> >
The bottom line is that gimp-dcraw is unuseable when you want to do a
high-quality import; ufraw works.
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | smurf@smurf.noris.de
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature