Bug#273470: marked as done (ITA: docbook-dsssl -- Modular DocBook DSSSL stylesheets, for print and HTML )
Your message dated Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:02:16 -0400
with message-id <E1CCLMm-0006nv-00@newraff.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#273470: fixed in docbook-dsssl 1.78-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Sep 2004 10:40:52 +0000
>From peter_e@gmx.net Sun Sep 26 03:40:52 2004
Return-path: <peter_e@gmx.net>
Received: from pop.gmx.de (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CBWSa-0005a4-00; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 03:40:52 -0700
Received: (qmail 28269 invoked by uid 65534); 26 Sep 2004 10:40:20 -0000
Received: from dsl-213-023-250-148.arcor-ip.net (EHLO colt.pezone.net) (213.23.250.148)
by mail.gmx.net (mp017) with SMTP; 26 Sep 2004 12:40:20 +0200
X-Authenticated: #495269
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: ITA: docbook-dsssl -- Modular DocBook DSSSL stylesheets, for print and HTML
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 12:40:20 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <[🔎] 200409261240.20104.peter_e@gmx.net>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Adam Di Carlo has agreed that I can take over this package since he
doesn't have time to maintain it anymore.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 273470-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Sep 2004 17:08:08 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Tue Sep 28 10:08:08 2004
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CCLSS-000183-00; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:08:08 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CCLMm-0006nv-00; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:02:16 -0400
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: 273470-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $
Subject: Bug#273470: fixed in docbook-dsssl 1.78-5
Message-Id: <E1CCLMm-0006nv-00@newraff.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:02:16 -0400
Delivered-To: 273470-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 8
Source: docbook-dsssl
Source-Version: 1.78-5
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
docbook-dsssl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
docbook-dsssl_1.78-5.diff.gz
to pool/main/d/docbook-dsssl/docbook-dsssl_1.78-5.diff.gz
docbook-dsssl_1.78-5.dsc
to pool/main/d/docbook-dsssl/docbook-dsssl_1.78-5.dsc
docbook-dsssl_1.78-5_all.deb
to pool/main/d/docbook-dsssl/docbook-dsssl_1.78-5_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 273470@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> (supplier of updated docbook-dsssl package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 09:26:53 +0200
Source: docbook-dsssl
Binary: docbook-dsssl
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.78-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Changed-By: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Description:
docbook-dsssl - modular DocBook DSSSL stylesheets, for print and HTML
Closes: 209360 248002 248003 250658 252494 253221 254510 273470
Changes:
docbook-dsssl (1.78-5) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* New maintainer (closes: #273470)
* Remove configuration files on purge (closes: #248002)
* Updated standards version
* Changed dependency order to prefer openjade over jade
* Removed httpd suggestion
* Removed perl build dependency, because it's essential
* New Japanese translation of debconf templates by
Kenshi Muto <kmuto@debian.org> (closes: #209360)
* New Dutch translation of debconf templates by
Luk Claes <luk.claes@ugent.be> (closes: #250658)
* New German translation of debconf templates by
Erik Schanze <schanzi_usenet@gmx.de> (closes: #252494)
* New Danish translation of debconf templates by
Michael Kristensen <michael@wtf.dk> (closes: #253221)
* Removed compatibility symlink in /usr/lib/sgml (closes: #248003);
adjusted README.Debian accordingly
* Added trailing slash to %callout-graphics-path% (closes: #254510)
* Removed stray debian/diff file
Files:
32b354d46adf7f4fbf628cceda27260d 605 text optional docbook-dsssl_1.78-5.dsc
efb74686c5161da403ee0847b6cd74dd 30774 text optional docbook-dsssl_1.78-5.diff.gz
ddb0c25336d8238022b760fe07bad4a7 357202 text optional docbook-dsssl_1.78-5_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD4DBQFBWZJ79/DnDzB9Vu0RAqpKAJYz0tD95zvCc+v05uB6siLbSCu8AJ4jV6kw
xBoyUuuqbH2/nswKpi8Cyw==
=nAN4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: