[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#239558: marked as done (ITP: f-spot -- Digital photo management application)



Your message dated Sun, 12 Sep 2004 00:29:25 -0400
with message-id <E1C6LzR-0000wX-00@newraff.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#239558: fixed in f-spot 0.0.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Mar 2004 12:36:38 +0000
>From awj@juckel.net Tue Mar 23 04:36:38 2004
Return-path: <awj@juckel.net>
Received: from astound-64-83-233-195.mn.astound.net (homestead) [64.83.233.195] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1B5l94-0001nl-00; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 04:36:38 -0800
Received: from awj by homestead with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1B5l93-0003Gu-00
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 06:36:37 -0600
From: Anthony W. Juckel <awj@juckel.net>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org> 
Subject: ITP: f-spot -- Digital photo management application
X-Debbugs-CC: Anthony W. Juckel <awj@juckel.net>
Message-Id: <E1B5l93-0003Gu-00@homestead>
Sender: "Anthony W. Juckel" <awj@homestead>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 06:36:37 -0600
X-BadReturnPath: awj@homestead rewritten as awj@juckel.net
  using "From" header
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
	X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

* Package name    : f-spot
  Version         : 0.0.1
  Upstream Author : Larry Ewing
* URL or Web page : http://www.gnome.org/projects/f-spot/
* License         : GPL
  Description     : Digital photo management application

 f-spot is written in C#/GTK#, and is meant to be an easy-to-use photo
 management application.  It allows for importing of your existing
 photo collections, tagging photos with identifiers, as well as doing
 simple edits of photos (e.g. rotating).  f-spot was originally
 written by the late Ettore Perazzoli.  After his passing,
 maintainership was picked up by Larry Ewing.


I'm currently building a package for f-spot.  Once it is lintian and
linda clean, I will seek a sponsor on debian-mentors.  The upstream
release says it is not yet ready for end user consumption, but I
believe there may be interest for early adopters to find the package
in unstable.

Anthony W. Juckel

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 239558-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2004 04:39:08 +0000
>From rdonald@newraff.debian.org Sat Sep 11 21:39:08 2004
Return-path: <rdonald@newraff.debian.org>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1C6M8q-0004rq-00; Sat, 11 Sep 2004 21:39:08 -0700
Received: from rdonald by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1C6LzR-0000wX-00; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 00:29:25 -0400
From: =?utf-8?b?T25kxZllaiBTdXLDvQ==?= <ondrej@debian.org>
To: 239558-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#239558: fixed in f-spot 0.0.2-1
Message-Id: <E1C6LzR-0000wX-00@newraff.debian.org>
Sender: Randall Donald <rdonald@newraff.debian.org>
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 00:29:25 -0400
Delivered-To: 239558-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: f-spot
Source-Version: 0.0.2-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
f-spot, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

f-spot_0.0.2-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/f/f-spot/f-spot_0.0.2-1.diff.gz
f-spot_0.0.2-1.dsc
  to pool/main/f/f-spot/f-spot_0.0.2-1.dsc
f-spot_0.0.2-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/f/f-spot/f-spot_0.0.2-1_i386.deb
f-spot_0.0.2.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/f/f-spot/f-spot_0.0.2.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 239558@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
OndÅ?ej Surý <ondrej@debian.org> (supplier of updated f-spot package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat,  4 Sep 2004 21:32:52 +0200
Source: f-spot
Binary: f-spot
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.0.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: OndÅ?ej Surý <ondrej@debian.org>
Changed-By: OndÅ?ej Surý <ondrej@debian.org>
Description: 
 f-spot     - personal photo management application
Closes: 239558
Changes: 
 f-spot (0.0.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Initial Release. (Closes: #239558)
Files: 
 5dcc9bf9ef50315143d8f4c2fcebf059 1515 gnome optional f-spot_0.0.2-1.dsc
 e32b32671da58f67aa0f9b1a437d56e5 545701 gnome optional f-spot_0.0.2.orig.tar.gz
 a182cd0f2c37de56865d272251a99c95 2115 gnome optional f-spot_0.0.2-1.diff.gz
 dbde2fbd584e32c7a69d6422f4ef26af 228972 gnome optional f-spot_0.0.2-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBOuY09OZqfMIN8nMRAtpTAJ9+ysMJj5Qxqz/hhQe+lePZ4y5NYwCfeYRt
vw72RpFSTwlOoh/paCgY4es=
=jWFc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: