[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#185381: marked as done (ITP: kannel-devel -- WAP and SMS gateway - development version)



Your message dated Sat, 7 Aug 2004 16:41:02 +0200
with message-id <CDE72244-E87F-11D8-812C-000A95CDDDF6@litux.org>
and subject line 
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Mar 2003 01:16:33 +0000
>From bruno.rodrigues@litux.org Tue Mar 18 19:16:33 2003
Return-path: <bruno.rodrigues@litux.org>
Received: from netc-gw.telecel.pt (laptop.litux.org) [212.18.162.33] 
	by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18vSC0-0006dR-00; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 19:16:32 -0600
Received: (qmail 19209 invoked by uid 1000); 19 Mar 2003 00:21:31 -0000
Message-ID: <20030319002130.19208.qmail@laptop.litux.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Bruno Rodrigues <bruno.rodrigues@litux.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: ITP: kannel-devel -- WAP and SMS gateway - development version
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 00:21:30 +0000
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
X-BadReturnPath: bruno@laptop.litux.org rewritten as bruno.rodrigues@litux.org
  using "From" header
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=4.0
	tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,X_DEBBUGS_CC
	version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-03-18
Severity: wishlist

* Package name    : kannel-devel
  Version         : 1.3.1
  Upstream Author : Kannel Group <devel@kannel.org>
* URL             : http://www.kannel.org/
* License         : BSD
  Description     : WAP and SMS gateway - development version

Kannel is a gateway for connecting WAP (Wireless Application Protocol)
phones to the Internet. It also works as an SMS gateway, for providing
SMS based services for GSM phones.
.
Development and/or CVS versions are stable enough and encouraged to use 
to enable constant testing. CVS bugs are usually fixed in one or to days
and a lot of developers use stable CVS versions in production.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux davi 2.4.19 #1 Mon Dec 2 15:53:51 WET 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=pt_PT@euro, LC_CTYPE=pt_PT@euro


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 185381-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Aug 2004 14:41:03 +0000
>From bruno.rodrigues@litux.org Sat Aug 07 07:41:03 2004
Return-path: <bruno.rodrigues@litux.org>
Received: from quad.dev.vodafone.pt (quad.vodafone.pt) [213.30.31.54] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BtSNb-0001pb-00; Sat, 07 Aug 2004 07:41:03 -0700
Received: (qmail 13614 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2004 15:40:39 +0100
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.21?) (bruno@212.202.209.24)
  by quad.dev.vodafone.pt with SMTP; 7 Aug 2004 15:40:39 +0100
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v618)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <CDE72244-E87F-11D8-812C-000A95CDDDF6@litux.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
To: 185381-done@bugs.debian.org
From: Bruno David Rodrigues <bruno.rodrigues@litux.org>
Subject: 
Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 16:41:02 +0200
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.618)
Delivered-To: 185381-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

development version, doesn't make sense to be packaged



Reply to: