On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 03:29:44PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 09:47:03AM +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> > > > Even though we classify the 0.7.x branch as the development/unstable
> > > > branch, we are mighty proud of the current state of ClanLib 0.7. It is
> > > > alot better than 0.6 in all ways, and we fully recommend using 0.7.x
> > > > instead of 0.6.5.
> >
> > Well if even upstream authors *fully* recommend using development branch
> > then I think it's stable enough.
>
> Which brings up the obvious question, why do they still classify it as
> development/unstable? Why don't they release it?
Well they're releasing it all the time, but as a development branch.
Maybe because of that many programs still using stable branch?
I don't know, but I'll try to get info from upstream about that.
regards
fEnIo
--
_ Bartosz Fenski | mailto:fenio@o2.pl | pgp:0x13fefc40 | IRC:fEnIo
_|_|_ 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Polska
(0 0) phone:+48602383548 | Slackware - the weakest link
ooO--(_)--Ooo http://skawina.eu.org | JID:fenio@jabber.org | RLU:172001
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature