Bug#230976: marked as done (O: onshore-timesheet -- A complete, Open Source, Web-based Time-Billing solution)
Your message dated Sat, 12 Jun 2004 18:38:11 -0600
with message-id <20040613003811.GA19335@merkel.debian.org>
and subject line Fixing WNPP problems
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Feb 2004 18:07:06 +0000
>From adam@gw-ny.onshored.com Tue Feb 03 10:07:06 2004
Return-path: <adam@gw-ny.onshored.com>
Received: from xena.bway.net [216.220.96.26]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ao4x0-0003wT-00; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 10:07:06 -0800
Received: (qmail 93102 invoked by uid 0); 3 Feb 2004 18:06:35 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO sopa) (216.220.110.137)
by xena.bway.net with SMTP; 3 Feb 2004 18:06:35 -0000
Received: by sopa (Postfix, from userid 421)
id 357698FBC0; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 13:06:30 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Adam Di Carlo <aph@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: O: onshore-timesheet -- A complete, Open Source,
Web-based Time-Billing solution
Reply-To: adam@onshored.com
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.39
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 13:06:30 -0500
Message-Id: <20040203180630.357698FBC0@sopa>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
X-Spam-Level:
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Orphaning this package. Is no longer maintained upstream.
Description: A complete, Open Source, Web-based Time-Billing solution
A commercially supported, GPL'd web application to allow for the
collection and approval of hours via the Web. Clients, jobs,
personnel, and hours are modeled and managed by the system.
Nightly reports give managers a list of their jobs and unapproved
hours. A flexible backend is provided for integration with billing
systems.
.
See http://www.onshore-timesheet.org/ for more information and
inquiries about commercial support, integration, or development.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux sopa 2.4.20-3-686 #1 Sat Jun 7 22:34:55 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 230976-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jun 2004 00:38:12 +0000
>From tbm@merkel.debian.org Sat Jun 12 17:38:12 2004
Return-path: <tbm@merkel.debian.org>
Received: from merkel.debian.org [192.25.206.16] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BZJ0l-0006ym-00; Sat, 12 Jun 2004 17:38:12 -0700
Received: from tbm by merkel.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BZJ0l-00051x-00; Sat, 12 Jun 2004 18:38:11 -0600
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 18:38:11 -0600
From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
To: 230976-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Fixing WNPP problems
Message-ID: <20040613003811.GA19335@merkel.debian.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@merkel.debian.org>
Delivered-To: 230976-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
# No package onshore-timesheet in Debian
removed from the archive.
--
Martin Michlmayr
tbm@cyrius.com
Reply to: