[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#239231: O: pose - PalmOS Emulator



reassign 239231 ftp.debian.org
retitle 239231 Please remove pose-skins
reassign 239233 ftp.debian.org
retitle 239233 Please remove pose
thanks

Please remove pose and pose-skins.

RoQA; orphaned, no upstream, doesn't build with GCC 3.3

* Juan Manuel Garcia Molina <juanma@debian.org> [2004-04-24 16:38]:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Hi, Martin.
> 
> On Saturday 24 April 2004 15:03, you wrote:
> > * Juan Manuel Garcia Molina <juanma@debian.org> [2004-03-21 18:04]:
> > > I have not enough free time to keep on maintaining this package, so I
> > > think I must orphan it.
> > >
> > > * pose is abandoned software. So, please, don't expect patches by
> > >   upstream authors.
> > >
> > > * I've been trying to port pose to gcc-3.3, without success. Thanks to
> >
> > Would you mind if we removed pose from Debian?  It is the only package
> > which depends on fltk (1.0) which in turn is orphaned and should be
> > removed.  Not working with GCC 3.3 is also not ideal.
> 
> I've written a list of pros and cons of removing pose from Debian. Basically:
> 
> PROS (removing pose):
> 
> 1. Upstream does not update pose (abandoned software).
> 2. Hard to make it compile with GCC 3.3.
> 3. Noone appears to take care of it (after >1 month of being orphaned).
> 
> CONS (removing pose):
> 
> 1. The only software in Debian to emulate PalmOS.
> 
> 
> So, I think pose should be removed from Debian (and pose-skins should also be 
> removed).
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Juanma.
> 
> - -- 
>         Juan Manuel  Garcia Molina
>         Debian GNU/Linux Developer
> juanma@debian.org     http://www.debian.org
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQFAinvf42HTkrCqhFARAk0pAJ4kfBrVsQMLYtIZvCbCOzLOsewHwgCfURXY
> RC5RLLwv/YB1VXd7ZHQlncw=
> =PWs9
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> 

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
tbm@cyrius.com



Reply to: