Bug#234418: [doko@cs.tu-berlin.de: Re: Removing gsdict]
reassign #234418 ftp.debian.org
retitle #234418 please remove gsdict
thanks
RoQA: dead upstream, unusable, RC bug, orphaned
Removal approved by the GNUStep maintainers.
----- Forwarded message from Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de> -----
From: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
To: Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
Cc: Eric Heintzmann <eric@gnustep.fr.st>, debian-qa@lists.debian.org,
Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
Subject: Re: Removing gsdict
X-Old-Spam-Flag:
Frank Lichtenheld writes:
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 11:55:14AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Martin Michlmayr writes:
> > > * Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org> [2004-02-27 14:14]:
> > > > The question is: Should we wait for someone to adopt it or remove it
> > > > from unstable? (I would go for removal)
> > >
> > > Removal is probably the best, but please give doko a few days to
> > > comment since he knows the status of GNUstep. Actually, asking MJ Ray
> > > would be a good idea since he knows about GNUstep too (mjr@d.o).
> >
> > Asking Eric (currently doing the GNUstep uploads) if wants to maintain
> > it.
>
> This was a week ago. Should I go ahead removing it?
there were some followups, all suggesting the removal. Go ahead!
----- End forwarded message -----
--
Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
Reply to: