Bug#120351: attal_0.7.2-1_i386.changes REJECTED
On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 12:07:41AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 11:11:41PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > It wasn't my intention to hijack the ITP. My impression was that after five
> > months from your last message there was no more activity, which turned out
> > not to be the case. Sorry for the oversight.
>
> What oversight? I hope you mean the fact that you did not ask back
> whether Raphael was still inclined to package attal; not that you
> accidently didn't know about his activity.
>
> It is not required to use the ITP bug report as a blog for all the
> different stuff you do for the package, but I really believe it is good
> mannors to at least pretend to try to contact the (seemingly inactive)
> ITPer.
Thoroughly agreed. Also, Robert, please use the 'owner' command to
control@ rather than 'submitter' for saying that you're taking
responsibility for a WNPP bug somebody else submitted, as mentioned at
<http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp>.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
Reply to: