Bug#231591: [Savane-dev] Re: Bug#231591: RFP: savane -- a Web-based Free Software hosting system.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 08 February 2004 20:28, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> > It's no problem to split savane up into different packages. Concerning
> > your debian directory, I would suggest to remove it from the savane
> > source code. The reason is that it would be a "Debian-native" package
> > otherwise, which in my opinion does not apply to savane.
>
> Hum, I clearly prefer having the debian directory managed by CVS, and by
> the project cvs is better than anywhere.
Sure, no doubt about that. Although I would like to add that arch would be
even better than CVS...
It's no problem to have a debian directory. The only thing is that it would be
cleaner to separate the sources from the bits used to package the project for
Debian, and someone using the sources should not have to care about packaging
details for one specific distribution. However, I don't plan to immediately
remove debian from the CVS, so don't worry.
> But maybe there are reasons I'm not aware of.
I'm trying to come up with some reasons. I'll get back to you. ;-)
> > By the way: I already stumbled across a few bugs, should I submit them in
> > the savane project page?
>
> Yes, that would be good.
> If they are trivial and you know a way to fix them, you can commit on
> the CVS directly.
>
> Before commiting, I'd like you to read first:
Will do.
> Someone suggested "Gna is Not an Acronym", I like this version.
Yep, that's good.
Cheers,
- --
Tobias
"We either learn from history or, uh, well, something bad will happen."
-- Bob Church
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAJpdFCqqEJ0Fs8twRAmwcAJ4inZmiKpe4d482dnMYrhKEeIJMKgCdEPaH
ozTJqUCL2NlXU54b9BFCSR4=
=t5Nd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: