On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 05:32:15AM +0200, Martin Buck wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > The current nfs-user-server only supports NFSv2, so it would be nice to > have unfs3 as an alternative to it. unfs3 probably can't fully replace > nfs-user-server since it doesn't include support for NFSv2, as far as I > understood. What are the advantages of using unfs3 instead of just using the NFSv3 kernel server (which works passing well, in my experience)? -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature