Bug#158156: marked as done (ITA: nvtv -- tool to control the TV chips on NVidia cards under Linux)
Your message dated Sat, 04 Oct 2003 21:17:10 -0400
with message-id <E1A5xWI-00051j-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#158156: fixed in nvtv 0.4.5-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 May 2002 08:50:15 +0000
>From inet@zombie.inka.de Fri May 03 03:50:15 2002
Return-path: <inet@zombie.inka.de>
Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (uni-kl.de) [131.246.137.52]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 173Yla-00029A-00; Fri, 03 May 2002 03:50:15 -0500
Received: from mailgate1.uni-kl.de (mailgate1.uni-kl.de [131.246.120.5])
by uni-kl.de (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.5) with ESMTP id g438oCi15128;
Fri, 3 May 2002 10:50:12 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from mailinf.rhrk.uni-kl.de (mailinf.rhrk.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.54])
by mailgate1.uni-kl.de (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g438oBNA027159;
Fri, 3 May 2002 10:50:11 +0200
Received: from domino.informatik.uni-kl.de (domino.informatik.uni-kl.de [131.246.161.19])
by mailinf.rhrk.uni-kl.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.11.5) with ESMTP id g438oAh21230;
Fri, 3 May 2002 10:50:10 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from zombie (rotes255.wohnheim.uni-kl.de [131.246.178.65])
by domino.informatik.uni-kl.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g438oBd06442;
Fri, 3 May 2002 10:50:11 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from inet by zombie with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 173YlY-00015P-00; Fri, 03 May 2002 10:50:12 +0200
Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 10:50:12 +0200
From: Eduard Bloch <edi@gmx.de>
To: submit@packages.debian.org
Cc: debian-devel@bugs.debian.org
Subject: ITA: most of my packages
Message-ID: <20020503085012.GA4093@zombie.inka.de>
Mail-Followup-To: submit@packages.debian.org, debian-devel@bugs.debian.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: Eduard Bloch <inet@zombie.inka.de>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Delivered-To: submit@packages.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Hi folks,
this is a non-standard way of doing this, but I will just try. Due to
lack of time in the comming weeks (and generally sinking interest in
maintianing stuff), I look for new maintainers for the following
packages.
General rules: The one who comes first gets the package. I wanna keep
the right to NMU if I discover any problems in them later.
List:
Allegro and packages based on it. Idealy for someone with experience in
library packaging:
allegro-demo-data(1)
allegro4(5)
liquidwar(2)
wing(2)
stax(1)
For boot-floppies (Oskuro):
cfdisk-utf8(1)
kernel-image-2.4.18-i386bf(2)
Various Kernel-Modules:
cdfs-src(1)
ftpfs(2)
dvb(4)
Needed work: figure out details of the module-packaging-policy and make
the packages compliant.
Rest:
emelfm(1)
icewm-themes(1)
kernel-image-2.2.20-udma100-ext3-i386(2)
kernel-patch-ethernet-drivers(1)
kernel-patch-ext3-2.2(1)
kernel-patch-ppscsi-2.4(1)
nvtv(1)
pppoeconf(1)
vdr(5)
kvdr(1)
videogen(1)
unp(1)
aumix(2)
cdrtools(4)
Gruss/Regards,
Eduard.
--
Linux - aus klaren Quellen wird ein starker Strom.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 158156-close) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Oct 2003 01:24:09 +0000
>From katie@auric.debian.org Sat Oct 04 20:24:08 2003
Return-path: <katie@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A5xd2-0004lU-00; Sat, 04 Oct 2003 20:24:08 -0500
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A5xWI-00051j-00; Sat, 04 Oct 2003 21:17:10 -0400
From: Roberto Lumbreras <rover@debian.org>
To: 158156-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.37 $
Subject: Bug#158156: fixed in nvtv 0.4.5-2
Message-Id: <E1A5xWI-00051j-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@auric.debian.org>
Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2003 21:17:10 -0400
Delivered-To: 158156-close@bugs.debian.org
Source: nvtv
Source-Version: 0.4.5-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
nvtv, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
nvtv_0.4.5-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/n/nvtv/nvtv_0.4.5-2.diff.gz
nvtv_0.4.5-2.dsc
to pool/main/n/nvtv/nvtv_0.4.5-2.dsc
nvtv_0.4.5-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/n/nvtv/nvtv_0.4.5-2_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 158156@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Roberto Lumbreras <rover@debian.org> (supplier of updated nvtv package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2003 02:55:34 +0200
Source: nvtv
Binary: nvtv
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.4.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Roberto Lumbreras <rover@debian.org>
Changed-By: Roberto Lumbreras <rover@debian.org>
Description:
nvtv - Tool to control TV chips on NVidia cards under Linux
Closes: 158156
Changes:
nvtv (0.4.5-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New maintainer, closes: #158156
Files:
941beb8fa5f0e8fc3b0f747185b492c1 627 admin optional nvtv_0.4.5-2.dsc
6c9bde64375504616dd336cf9d273989 3880 admin optional nvtv_0.4.5-2.diff.gz
1ec61eae8e7fde42fb441ffaffdd7172 262804 admin optional nvtv_0.4.5-2_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/f2+sfIEQE/XJcI0RAuE/AKCPmbhtAm1xWrncoxmjNH3TwUhRFACff0lH
KYuS7Lf5c500aAHmfQQ6ZAQ=
=7hPa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: