Bug#205927: This is not really an ITP s much as an ITA

To: 205927@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#205927: This is not really an ITP s much as an ITA
From: paul@cupis.co.uk (Paul Cupis)
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2003 17:38:14 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20030817163814.GA16458@cupis.co.uk>
Reply-to: paul@cupis.co.uk (Paul Cupis), 205927@bugs.debian.org

Artur R. Czechowski <arturcz@hell.pl> wrote:
> Would you like to send a wish-report to eggdrop package and reqest
> a package with newer upstream release?

It looks like the submitter has already asked for a new upstream in
#202199 "eggdrop: New version 1.6.15 available".

I think that this was meant as an ITA, not an ITP.

Paul Cupis
-- 
paul@cupis.co.uk

Attachment: pgpsWUttfo9cJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Prev by Date: Bug#205927: ITP: eggdrop -- Advanced IRC Robot
Next by Date: Bug#205927: ITP: eggdrop -- Advanced IRC Robot
Previous by thread: Bug#205927: marked as done (ITA: eggdrop -- Advanced IRC Robot)
Next by thread: Processed: This is an ITA, not an ITP
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread